Ok. Nevertheless, my reread of iguana also has confirmation bias leading me to see a scum!iguana narrative. I really like his play from D1/D2, but can totally see it as being scum. For example, the faust/WW situation.
The entire time he was on faust, but was fighting Ampharos' scumread on faust. He kept going back and saying that Ampharos' read was pure tunneling and no substance, even while he was voting for faust.
Also, he had a reads list that put faust/WW as 1/2 for likelihood of being scum. Now, that is super hedgy. Because the way things were, no one was going to say that they were both scum. Sure, he was just saying that they were both scummy, but it gave him a perfect out to vote for WW (which he did briefly) when he wanted to without attracting too much attention. Granted, this is over a long period of time and lots of posts and reads change, but the way he handled the whole situation seems scummy. Keep scum partner faust as your vote, but leave that door wide open to lynch WW if the opportunity arises.