WW also deserves a response.
It's good enough if I'm right.
I realized this: my role specifically says I target a player to create a QT with them. If you are untargettable, my action should fail and I should not create a QT, not just you wouldn't receive the link. But I did create it, and I posted in it.
Well, did you ask yuma what would happen in such a scenario? If this is really true, that would have interesting implications. Why would scum!me choose not to post in such a QT though?
I asked; we'll see if I can get an answer. The only reason I can think of was that you already intended to claim to Hide last night, or needed to leave the possibility open. Or you believed it would help validate your claim, as you thought it would confirm you.
It doesn't make sense, as a town Hider, that you die if you target someone that performs a killing action. Since when did Hiding behind a Vig kill a Hider?
I assume the clause is there so that I would die if I hide behind PPS. What sense does it make for scum!me not just to claim the standard Hider?
Why isn't it non-Town, though?
I don't believe PPS made up getting two results; that's not something that would occur to any of us to make up. Plus based on our QT discussion, I don't buy it. You're the only Hider and the only thing that explains two results. It's possible that he lied about receiving Guilty, but still he targetted Jimmm (he also claimed this in the QT the night before) and you claimed to hide behind Ampharos. So that leaves.. a Redirection from PPS's actions to Ampharos. Or those targetting Jimmmm to Ampharos, which would contradict XP's claim.
Obviously scum lies. I agree that it seems a strange thing for PPS to make up, and I am not sold on the theory that he did make it up, but well there might be reasons to do that. And I find it very strange that nobody died from targetting Jimmmmm N1.
It is explained by Xerxes result.
You don't seem to be analyzing the night actions and possibilities, which seems very out of character.
Did you actually read my posts? My vote, my reads all are heavily influenced by the N3 analysis I made. I did not make similar analyses for previous nights because there where more players we don't know about and thus more variables. I was also petty happy with the results I got from looking into D3.
Well, a big feeling of that was this post:
I don't think this whole exchange is actually leading anywhere.
WW, what are your reads? Same question to the lurkers (Hydrad/Egor)
which just felt dismissive of trying to figure out what happened, which (I think) was different than things that you had said. But maybe you had just already thought through all of these. Still, there was new info from answers from Yuma on how roles work.
PPEs
Author
Topic: RMM 28: Simply Simpler Simple Mafia (Game Over) (Read 138631 times)