His theory talk is UoSy of him.
<3
Anyway, I really like this post. Makes me not want to lynch gkrieg today. I know we sometimes give too much credit for effort, but the fact is, he's putting in effort, and the reads feel like genuine reads. I don't know, that's not some brilliant reason, but this post feels like genuine impressions rather than manufactured reads, and without looking back, my impression was that scum!gkrieg didn't give us this kind of genuine-feeling input. Worth looking at with more effort than this off-the-top-of-my-head stuff if he does something scummy tomorrow, but makes me not want him dead today at least.
@Gkrieg: Sudgy is not a policy vote or purely a lurker vote. I mean he's a lurker, and if you're going to lynch a lurker Day 1 is the day to do it, but I don't like lynching lurkers at random. I
do like lynching lurkers when a lot of the living players have done something that makes me not want to lynch them in a day. A lot of town reads and a null lurker make lurking scum more likely.
And I've been trying to put my finger on it, but Sudgy's 3rd post felt weird™ to me too. I haven't been able to articulate why though, and I've been trying to think of how to phrase it. I am townreading Awaclus and Ghacob though.
So yeah, new lynch pool is Sudgy and QS.