DominionStrategy Wiki
Bomb, Cannon, and many of the Gunpowder cards can strongly effect gameplay, particularly in a destructive way
If two witches watched two watches, which witch would watch which watch?
My brother once used Sea Hag and I used Witch. My brother crushed me, and he used this as proof that Sea Hag > Witch.
Quote from: Donald X. on October 28, 2014, 04:29:33 pm...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
Quote from: Seprix on July 10, 2015, 04:58:20 pmMy brother once used Sea Hag and I used Witch. My brother crushed me, and he used this as proof that Sea Hag > Witch.Ugh. The plural of anecdote is not data.
The board is Ambassador, Sea Hag, Marauder, Witch, Torturer, Mountebank, Soothsayer, Cultist, Giant, Swamp Hag. Events are Ferry and Alms. Which corner do you run and cry into?
Quote from: Awaclus on July 10, 2015, 02:21:55 pmIf two witches watched two watches, which witch would watch which watch?I'm pretty sure it's "swatch watches"
Posting begets posting.
Donald X made me a design snob.
the sea hag has a 1 in 11 chances of hitting your opponents witch plus it puts the curse in your opponents deck sooner if there is a smithy or a better drawing card for after sea hag becomes useless that will be better than witch's draw 2 also you will be wanting to get a second curser and that 2nd one will probably be a sea hag although if u got your 1st witch idk what the odds are of getting 5 in your next cyclethis is all assuming you don't buy anything for 2 but I would get a cellar.
Quote from: Tables on July 10, 2015, 05:05:05 pmQuote from: Seprix on July 10, 2015, 04:58:20 pmMy brother once used Sea Hag and I used Witch. My brother crushed me, and he used this as proof that Sea Hag > Witch.Ugh. The plural of anecdote is not data.If you're criticizing him, awesome. If you're criticizing me, I was posting this to show how silly it was. I think he hit my Witch with Sea Hag the first two shuffles, too.
Sea Hag just isn't a very good card.
Quote from: AdamH on July 17, 2015, 04:52:55 amSea Hag just isn't a very good card.Really? I thought it was generally considered to be one of the strongest $4s.
Quote from: Jimmmmm on July 17, 2015, 01:12:47 pmQuote from: AdamH on July 17, 2015, 04:52:55 amSea Hag just isn't a very good card.Really? I thought it was generally considered to be one of the strongest $4s.Even if it is; one of the strongest $4s isn't going to be as good as your average $5.
Quote from: Seprix on July 10, 2015, 06:07:42 pmQuote from: Tables on July 10, 2015, 05:05:05 pmQuote from: Seprix on July 10, 2015, 04:58:20 pmMy brother once used Sea Hag and I used Witch. My brother crushed me, and he used this as proof that Sea Hag > Witch.Ugh. The plural of anecdote is not data.If you're criticizing him, awesome. If you're criticizing me, I was posting this to show how silly it was. I think he hit my Witch with Sea Hag the first two shuffles, too.I'm criticising him for using this as proof. Also how did that (my) post get into one of the top messages of the week? Slow F.DS week I suppose. We need more Apothecary x Herbalist love stories to soak up the respect.
If you have to choose between Witch and a Cultist, it's not even a contest. Easily Cultist is better.