But then again nobody here is so arrogant as to assume that some stupid fan cards can as good as official cards.
Should have been obvious that my statement is a stochastic one. If one says that men are stronger than women, that X is a better runner than Z or that the weather will be bad tomorrow it is totally clear to anybody who is not a total moron that the stochastic caveats are implicit.
ON AVERAGE men are stronger than women, UNLESS Z HAS A GOOD DAY AND Z A BAD DAY, X is the better runner than Z, THE LIKELIHOOD THAT IT WILL RAIN TOMORROW IS .8 is how you would state the above stuff unambiguously. Stylistically such statements are quite horrible which is why nobody uses them.
Your statement isn't stochastic. Even though you adapted it slightly during the discussion (from "no fan card can be a card as good as official cards" to "no fan can repeatedly make cards as good as Donald's") to give your point a little more substance, it's still not stochastic. Stochastic would be "fans on average have a higher likelihood to make bad cards than Donald has", and, applied to all fans overall, nobody here doubts that.
Your claim isn't that, though, it's that no possible fan could ever be as good as Donald. As you don't have information about every existing fan and gave no forcing logical reason why that should be the case, you are just making statements that you can't back up. It's like saying no free-time runner could be as fast as a specific olympic runner. It might be true that there is none, but claiming it's generally impossible is just wrong.
So now you say, hey, i never implied it's general, i was just making a stochastic statement on fans overall. Of course there could be a fan who's as good as doing stuff as the official creator, i just wanted to say it's very unlikely. If so, well, forgive me, but i can't shake the feeling you're just changing your mind now to avoid looking bad.
Besides, Black Market is "whacky". King is expensive and strong, and that's it.