Since we're doing the would-not-lynch list thing, mine is woefully short:
Teproc, pacovf.
With this level of engagement it would be very easy for scum to lead town around into mislynches without having to stick their nose out too far. Chairs and Awalcus' behavior is actively anti-town. So if you're town, maybe try to be useful or actually commit to something that you can be held to later. This sort of play as town is great for your scum game, but you're going to be town more often then scum, so if you're town
ACT LIKE IT.
Anyway, when I voted Awalcus yesterday, I wasn't actually interested in lynching him. I think I am now, but I want some input from those of you who have played with him a lot.
I read Awalcus' posts in a bunch of his recent games and skimmed the content around them. His meta appears to be that he tries harder and defends himself more as scum. But it still looks to me that he comes in and defends himself as town too. Yesterday he was posting on site while ignoring his wagon, which he continues to do.
This quote from RMM 24 caught my eye (he was town there.)
- can you explain exactly what it is from your scum meta which you fail to replicate as town? I've heard you saying that you're easily found at as scum a bunch of times, but never understood why.
2) Well, I don't particularly try to replicate my scum meta when I'm town. Anyway, I always feel enormous pressure to make sense and explain everything as scum. Even in Blarnia Mafia where I somehow got away with it, I explained all of my votes and reads unless the reasons were very clear without an explanation. I obviously do not feel any pressure to explain anything at all when I'm town.
When I read this, I got to thinking: he seems hyper aware of this, and in this game it looks to me (and this is where I need input from people who've actually played with him a bunch rather than skimmed some games) that he's been explaining and defending himself even less than usual.
I'm postulating that he's overcompensating for his known scumtell.
Thoughts?
PPE: 4