Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Delirious Deleuze]

Id rather lynch** ash

[Witherweaver]

Id rather lynch** ash

You didn't address the issue.  How many times have you seen Ash strongly defend against his partner's lynch?

[Witherweaver]

His usual thing is to argue the pros and cons in a faux neutral way and end up on whichever side of the fence he thinks looks more townie.  Here he was against Egor all the way, right?

[Delirious Deleuze]

Id rather lynch** ash

You didn't address the issue.  How many times have you seen Ash strongly defend against his partner's lynch?

I've never really seen him play.

PPE(1): if you are town, you should use your power on ash and get a read on him. If you flip town we'll have narrowed down one person moreso

[Awaclus]

His usual thing is to argue the pros and cons in a faux neutral way and end up on whichever side of the fence he thinks looks more townie.  Here he was against Egor all the way, right?

Well, it sure sounds like the three of you decided to whiteknight each other as much as possible no matter what. Too scummy to be actually scum, etc.

[Awaclus]

I'd rather ash. If you're lying about WW then you have a scum partner out there. I'd rather kill the option for your partner first then move to WW plus we'd have investigation to help.

Sorry, I didn't see this in time so I already sent the invitation to ash. I tried to uninvite ash and invite WW after I saw this, but I'm not sure if it's going to work.

[chairs]

I'd rather lynch ww than ash.

[ashersky]

I guess subtlety isn't useful.

You all are doing analysis as if this is a normal game, but it isn't.  Maybe it's because I played in the championships, but you all have to realize the difference between the lynch systems here.

No majority required here means the way bussing, protection, wagon-building, everything is different.

If you think anyone tried to save Egor yesterday, you are misunderstanding the implications of this rule.  EgorK was the top vote getter and was being lynched.  Scum hammers there for cred, he doesn't try to change multiple votes near the end.  It's too difficult.

[ashersky]

I'd rather ash. If you're lying about WW then you have a scum partner out there. I'd rather kill the option for your partner first then move to WW plus we'd have investigation to help.

Sorry, I didn't see this in time so I already sent the invitation to ash. I tried to uninvite ash and invite WW after I saw this, but I'm not sure if it's going to work.

I have not received anything.

[Delirious Deleuze]

I'd rather ash. If you're lying about WW then you have a scum partner out there. I'd rather kill the option for your partner first then move to WW plus we'd have investigation to help.

Sorry, I didn't see this in time so I already sent the invitation to ash. I tried to uninvite ash and invite WW after I saw this, but I'm not sure if it's going to work.

I want everyone to note this. If WW flips town, the team is ash and awaclus.

[Witherweaver]

I guess subtlety isn't useful.

You all are doing analysis as if this is a normal game, but it isn't.  Maybe it's because I played in the championships, but you all have to realize the difference between the lynch systems here.

No majority required here means the way bussing, protection, wagon-building, everything is different.

If you think anyone tried to save Egor yesterday, you are misunderstanding the implications of this rule.  EgorK was the top vote getter and was being lynched.  Scum hammers there for cred, he doesn't try to change multiple votes near the end.  It's too difficult.

So what does that tell you?

[Delirious Deleuze]

I'd rather ash. If you're lying about WW then you have a scum partner out there. I'd rather kill the option for your partner first then move to WW plus we'd have investigation to help.

Sorry, I didn't see this in time so I already sent the invitation to ash. I tried to uninvite ash and invite WW after I saw this, but I'm not sure if it's going to work.

Probably because it was just sent. Give it time.
I have not received anything.

[Witherweaver]

I guess subtlety isn't useful.

You all are doing analysis as if this is a normal game, but it isn't.  Maybe it's because I played in the championships, but you all have to realize the difference between the lynch systems here.

No majority required here means the way bussing, protection, wagon-building, everything is different.

If you think anyone tried to save Egor yesterday, you are misunderstanding the implications of this rule.  EgorK was the top vote getter and was being lynched.  Scum hammers there for cred, he doesn't try to change multiple votes near the end.  It's too difficult.

So what does that tell you?

About potential Egor partners, I mean.

[Delirious Deleuze]

Also, if WW flips town, I predict that ash and awaclus will try to pin it on me and hockey.

[ashersky]

As for punishment...I don't know why he screwed me and not you two.  My gut says he felt okay punishing me because there's more town to keep the game fair.  If you punish scum at a time when you are already down one, that's harsh.

Would Faust make punishment decisions with balance in mind?  Probably, if it meant keeping the game going for everyone.  That's the point right?  To keep the game from degenerating into a must-call-it-off scenario?

But, well, I'm leaving the masons are lying thing alone for a bit.  Eventually you will get caught out when you never die and keep killing off town.

[ashersky]

I'd rather ash. If you're lying about WW then you have a scum partner out there. I'd rather kill the option for your partner first then move to WW plus we'd have investigation to help.

Sorry, I didn't see this in time so I already sent the invitation to ash. I tried to uninvite ash and invite WW after I saw this, but I'm not sure if it's going to work.

I want everyone to note this. If WW flips town, the team is ash and awaclus.

When you see you are wrong, what can we expect from you?

You know what, given the mod ensured I'd be of no use this game, let's lynch me for the dole purpose of proving you wrong.

vote: ashersky

[ashersky]

Faust, I expect when it's over and we see this setup, it'll be every bit as awesome as it seems.  Sorry I couldn't stay till the end.

[ashersky]

I have a resurrection power, by the way, for anyone wondering if/when that was coming into play.

[silverspawn]

I have a resurrection power, by the way, for anyone wondering if/when that was coming into play.

cool. can you resurrect Hydrad, Lekkit, or Ghacob?

[Delirious Deleuze]

I'd rather ash. If you're lying about WW then you have a scum partner out there. I'd rather kill the option for your partner first then move to WW plus we'd have investigation to help.

Sorry, I didn't see this in time so I already sent the invitation to ash. I tried to uninvite ash and invite WW after I saw this, but I'm not sure if it's going to work.

I want everyone to note this. If WW flips town, the team is ash and awaclus.

When you see you are wrong, what can we expect from you?

You know what, given the mod ensured I'd be of no use this game, let's lynch me for the dole purpose of proving you wrong.

vote: ashersky

vote: ashersky.

So I'm now definitely thinking the punishment thing was a lie. Specifically Faust told us when he warned us that he only warned ash.

Plus several other players have confirmed were masons in different ways. WW and mail-mi. And I think I know why we haven't died yet. You wanted to use our living as some sort of hedge and call us scum the whole time.

The team is awaclus and ash.

Give: Ash

[silverspawn]

So I'm now definitely thinking the punishment thing was a lie. Specifically Faust told us when he warned us that he only warned ash.

if this is true, why didn't you counterclaim ash right away? that's the kind of stuff which makes me question your credibility.

[Witherweaver]

Is, third party "survivor" Masons a thing?  Like, they win if one of them are alive at the end of the game?

[silverspawn]

Is, third party "survivor" Masons a thing?  Like, they win if one of them are alive at the end of the game?

that would be ... interesting, because then we have like 4 survivors. survivor themed set? not impossible

[chairs]

I'm so very, very lost this game.

[Delirious Deleuze]

So I'm now definitely thinking the punishment thing was a lie. Specifically Faust told us when he warned us that he only warned ash.

if this is true, why didn't you counterclaim ash right away? that's the kind of stuff which makes me question your credibility.

We talked about it in the QT actually. I didn't think he'd go as far as lying about that. I figured that when Faust said he gave a warning to ash that he just didn't want to tell us public ally about the punishment. The fact that he's NOW trying to spin this into some tale about Faust not trying to need scum makes me think it was a purposeful lie and Faust was completely direct and didn't actually punish him.