Sorry if it came across patronizing but all I was doing was clarifying my point. Obviously one of us is misunderstanding something so let's go through this step by step and you can point out if I get anything wrong. That should clarify where we are:
With Watchtower, you'd still be drawing the Woodcutter anyway.
This is the original statement to which I was replying. I think that this is not true, because if you don't reveal the Watchtower to put the Woodcutter on top of the deck, you in fact won't be drawing the Woodcutter anyway.
You don't have to reveal Watchtower.
I make a simple statement to point out that I believe the former statement is not correct, by giving a reson why it is not correct.
I think he means that there would be no difference between Woodcutter and Nomad Camp in that scenario because you could just Watchtower the Woodcutter and it'd be almost exactly like a Nomad Camp.
You pretty much state what the original statement said, with a few more details of how the Woodcutter gets to the top of your deck. I know that that's what he means, and I have already pointed out that it's not correct. If I bought a Nomad Camp in this scenario, it would be on my deck whether or not I reveal a Watchtower. If I buy a Woodcutter in this scenario, there is a difference. I could reveal the Watchtower to put it on my deck OR I could not reveal the Watchtower and have it in my discard pile. That is a clear difference. Where have I gone wrong?