So, what's the goal, here? Are we saying, "cards that in practice, you would ignore," or are we saying, "A perfectly optimal player would ignore them"?
Because, in practice obviously nobody's going to buy BVs on the theory that they'll be controlling shuffles. But, sure, a perfectly optimal player could potentially eke some kind of small advantage out of that.
Similarly, any VP card at all, even Fairgrounds that are only worth 2VP: it's pretty easy to imagine scenarios in which the right play is to buy this card. Example:
You and your opponent have depleted the Duchies pile. You have exactly $6 and know that if you have a 2 VP advantage, your opponent will not be able to take the final Province without handing you the game. Clearly, the proper play is to take the Fairgrounds.
Or, hell, a magical VP card that cost $11 and was worth only 1 VP: still there are scenarios in which you should buy it (Duchies and Estates are depleted, you need more VPs, and the last Province will cause the game to end and you to lose: you should buy our hypothetical Bad VP card).
So, no VP cards at all can be in the Kingdom.