The way you voted for Witherweaver. The way you reacted when I voted for you. The self-voting. The fact that you put suspicion on me but vote for someone else.
ppe: 1
This is in response to Hydrad asking why ADK is voting him. I think ADK not taking into account that Hydrad is a relatively new player and that he's just soing newbie things is scummy. You can't possibly hsve a solid case this early in the game but ADK is trying to make it look like he does.
You don't think that self-voting after a few votes is something a newbie scum player would do? And it's certainly possible to have solid cases on people day one. I had a really awesome case on WW in Monster's U right off the bat and wasn't belligerent enough to push it. I'm trying to be more belligerent these days.
Self voting could come from newbie town or scum. That's completely null for me. Yes it's possible to have a solid case day 1 but my point is that your case is far from solid, but you're trying hard to make it seem like it is.
I understand I'm kinda lurking and I'm sorry about that but I've posted at twice about ADK and the only one to respond is ADK. Does anybody else have an opinion on what I'm saying?
I thought I had responded.
ADK usually casts suspicions and makes cases pretty early, usually on not much, and quite often against me. Recall Monster's U, Stack the Deck, Homeland, etc.
From what I've seen of scum ADK, he tends to be more reserved and careful, feeling things out and not being the one to propose a case that no one else has seen. However, I've only seen scum ADK in my first newbie game and a Bastard/Drunk game, so not the best data points.
Also, I think I've brought up this point before, so ADK surely has to be aware that this impression of him is out there by at least one person, so he may which to replicate this.
Currently, I'm reserving judgement.