I voted for lio because I mostly agree with ashersky's case and to see if it took off because if it did he was likely town. I felt leaving out the explanation served this purpose as well as did that thing we do when people speak as if they are above vote in the game.
Finally, I take deep exception to the idea that scum do not make good points. When I am scum I am certain to make good points to improve my chances of survival.
No way can you say that I spoke as if I was above vote in this game. I spoke as if I was above being voted without explanation, which I as well as everyone else in the game is.
Leaving out the explanation served no purpose.
The points that scum make are by definition bad because they are wrong. All points scum makes are for the point of their own survival. Of course scum will try to make points that appear to be good, but deep down they are bad points. Him thinking that my point was good means either:
a) I am town and made a good point.
OR
b) I am scum and made a bad point that was convincing enough to make ash think it was a good point.
Do you have a reason to think b is more likely than a? Does ashersky? No, neither of you do, and that's why the case is bad.