Yeah I was not going to include that part. I think 90% of the argument remains if you think Trump is smart, which she definitely does. A group of people powerful enough to rule all major governments ought to be able to stop the campaign of one person even if he's not an utter idiot
Actually I feel inspired to write The ten most annoying things in the world, preliminary list
10. wounds on my tongue that make eating painful
9. people arguing that politicians who advocate for term limits need to step down early
8. bureaucracy
7. offensive ggs
6. having to beg high status people for things
5. people making no sense when talking about consciousness
4. dropping the article when translating movie titles / disregarding the article of movies/albums/books when sorting items
3. people saying Elon Musk is a bad guy, especially if they pretend to care about climate change (sorry faust)
2. people not changing their minds
1. insects
Wouldn't anyone with a Mayor PM just claim? And end up generating way too many ICs?
No exile is always bad, but it's much worse in an odd start game.
You're right of course; 13 is far better than 12. But I'm suggesting that 12 is a fair bit better than 11 because of the chance that we'll still be 11 on Day 2 (or etc down the line).
Unrelated thought: I think with Doctors (particularly 1-Shot), it's better early on to be at an even number to give them a chance to bring us back up to odd. Which means the no-exile was particularly bad, in theory at least.
I'm curious, if it was not a crumb, then what was that EFHW read about?
I don't agree. Cop results are still valuable even if they're innocent results. Having another IC in this game would have done a lot for us. (Obviously there's Godfather, so innocent results are slightly worse, but still good.)I'm going to be honest, I'm so glad town won so that being gimped by my interpretation of the EE roll didn't cost them... Turns out all you need is a 1-shot cop to turn the tide lol
Agreed that town missed a PR because of the EE roll. They should have had another 1-shot cop or 1-shot doc.
But I do think it actually cost us, as scum, even worse. We expected T or TT based on our roles. So we figured 4 or 5 PRs (something like full cop is equivalent to 2). When only 3 came up in massclaim (ECM), I expected a hidden UB, that e was full cop, or someone else who lied. Because of that, I pushed for it, said more than I otherwise would have, and got caught partly because of things I said - and that was my mistake. That's also why I had to ask for setup clarification publicly, to start justifying why I said the things I did and setup how and when I would add my fake-claim (from the moment iguana didn't claim cop, I started planning the claim that I ended up making too late).
Overall, still a good game. I just wish e had actually been a full cop... then ECCMTT would have made sense.
Yeah, the benefit of having say extra Cop shots is an increased likelihood of getting a guilty result. The fact that we got one from our only shot means that we really weren't hurt by it.
But I also think it's hard to play when your information doesn't match the public information and you can't talk about it. I'm not sure who was worse off there.
I have no idea how MiX decides what is towny or not. He is an an enigma.
It feels super awesome when you actually end up being right.
.......Except I have an abysmal track record of actually being right
It's been a bit since I've won as town AND survived to the end.I feel you! I can't remember the last game this happened for me. Probably like one of those 9-player games with 2 scum and a perfect town win.
Feels even better to win knowing that the game was kind of stacked against you. Though in a weird way I also feel scum got a bit screwed over by the setup ambiguity.
I would like to also read the Mason QT btw.
Eh, whatever. I'm going to win game 29!It could happen.
It is possible to calculate the maximum amount of time remaining in a game.
This post, being an hour after #29, means that Game 29 (if it ever begins) will be over before Boxing Day.
Is it bad for the game if I'm not trying to win?
I think Jimmmmm has won.
But I would have been winning if MiX had posted 5 seconds earlier...
Can you not end the game and win with the same post? Strange.
Ah, I didn't consider that, and didn't intend it to work that way.
Maybe rule 2 should have said "The game ends when it becomes impossible for the next post to be the shortest necro."
I think Jimmmmm has won.
But I would have been winning if MiX had posted 5 seconds earlier...
