Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

26

Rules Questions / Re: Effect of Outpost in a Possession'ed turn?

« on: July 05, 2017, 11:58:36 am »

Then why does the wiki say : "This makes Outpost an exception to the basic rule that Duration cards are discarded from play during the Clean-up phase of the last turn on which they "do something"; Outpost doesn't do anything on the extra turn it creates, but it is not cleaned up until the end of the extra turn regardless." ?

EDIT : The new wording is official, no ? So we need to make erratas on the wiki pages of Mission, Outpost and Possession.

27

Rules Questions / Re: Effect of Outpost in a Possession'ed turn?

« on: July 05, 2017, 11:39:25 am »

So now, Outpost will never stay in play more than one turn ?
Because contrary to the previous wording, if you play extra Outposts, they will be like extra Tactitians and will be discarded.

28

Rules Questions / Re: Effect of Outpost in a Possession'ed turn?

« on: July 05, 2017, 10:35:20 am »

But this new wording changes the behaviour of the physical Outpost card, doesn't it ?

I mean, for Mission the verification that the previous turn wasn't yours happens not when you create the extra turn, but when you buy the Mission, so that's why even if you play your Outpost turn just after your normal turn, you can still play the Mission turn even if the previous turn was yours (it was your normal turn).

For the old wording of Outpost, the check to see if an extra turn can happen occurs after Outpost is supposed to be discarded, and that's why Outpost would stay in play (because a Duration) until it doesn't affect the next turn anymore.

But with the new wording, doesn't Outpost becomes like Mission ? The check is done when you play the Outpost, and if the conditions are verified (first Outpost and previous turn not yours), it creates necessarily and immediately an extra turn. So it doesn't do anything on the next turn anymore, and should be discarded as if not a Duration.

I hope that I'm intelligible. Thanks for answering !

29

Rules Questions / Re: Donate and Possession

« on: July 04, 2017, 01:59:15 pm »

Ok, so it's just to avoid an obvious Pin, isn't it ?

30

Rules Questions / Donate and Possession

« on: July 04, 2017, 01:54:04 pm »

I'm asking this because on the wiki, there's this statement on Donate's FAQ:

• This happens between turns, and so Possession (from Dominion: Alchemy) will no longer be doing anything.

And I just don't understand what it means, so could you clarify ?
My first thought was "?", and when I stopped to think, the only meaning I could find was "This happen after the Possession turn if there is one." But I find that totally illogical, I'd rather think that you would get to choose which one happens first, no ?

31

Let's Discuss ... / Re: empires: salt the earth

« on: June 28, 2017, 05:39:31 pm »

Ok thanks !
I was like, can you trigger "when you trash a card" effect with this event — because I wasn't sure that was really you that made the action "trash" ? But I realized there was no card with such effect, so I asked in the case of Feodum instead

32

Let's Discuss ... / Re: empires: salt the earth

« on: June 28, 2017, 03:49:19 pm »

So if I trash a Feodum with Salt the Earth, I get the Silvers ?