6076
Variants and Fan Cards / Re: Illusionist (Reserve card)
« on: April 08, 2015, 06:43:31 pm »"Each other player gains a Curse card."
I just noticed that this sort of precludes any future card with the Curse type: only Witch, Sea hag, Embargo and Torturer refer to "Curse cards", all other cursers just instruct you to gain a "Curse".
(if a card with the Curse type was added, those four cards would leave you a choice as to which card you gain; all others would force you to gain plain ol' Curse).
Where are you getting this rule that "Curse" means "The card named Curse", while "Curse card" means "A card with the Curse type"? As far as I know, there's nothing in the rules like that. In fact, Spice Merchant seems to prove this wrong. It says "trash a Treasure", not "trash a Treasure card."
Anyway, lots of times in the past people have tried to create fan cards with the Curse type, and they have always been rejected as a bad idea because it's undefined in the rules how this would interact with cards that refer to "Curse".
I think it's the kind of rules issue that Donald would just wipe away, saying "And that's how it is.". Like he did with Duration Attacks. Or cards that gain from the trash. Declare it is that way, and ta-dah! It works.
I do agree with LastFootnote though, the Actions-as-Treasures thing is really broken and ugly.
I'm not sure what you mean. What duration attacks or gaining from trash rules did Donald have to come up with? With "curse" vs "curse card", it's simply an issue of using 2 different wordings to mean the same thing. Just like "silver" vs "silver card", or "treasure" vs "treasure card".