Depending on how you define depth, chess is not as deep as Dominion.
I know several people who believe Go to be a deeper game because chess is so much more easily conquered by AI
I'm surprised Samuel L didn't grab Tarantino, go to the studio, and just f**k every foley editor's s**t up over that one."I have had it with these monkey-fighting snakes on this Monday-to-Friday plane!" -Samuel Jackson
This was the actual TV version of the line.
Dear god.
I'd love to see how they deal with Blazing Saddles on network television.
"KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNN!!"
My favorite censorship of all time... For those of you Big Lebowski fans (I know at least Davio is!), you should all know the line "This is what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass!"
When I saw the movie on Comedy Central?
"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the alps!"
Black LotusSpoils
$0 Treasure
Worth $3
----
When you play this card, trash it.
(And you thought it was overpowered in a Magic Deck...)
Bad chemistry pun on top of bad chemistry pun.
Egyptian -> Egypt ion -> ion is a (highly) charged entity
One suggestion I have: display which way the piles are splayed, if any. Sometimes it is not immediately obvious, especially if the tucked cards have no symbols revealed by the splay.
Also, it still doesn't work on FF 9.0.1, so I had to use IE instead. I'm sure it works on Chrome at home, but what's the point of Isotropic if you can't play it at work?
Think about it this way: would you get a copy of StarCraft: The Board Game free because you bought StarCraft 2?
Feature suggestion: Add a warning for when you're going to be activating a dogma that your opponent has a higher score in (a demand that will fail or dogma that will be shared). It could work just like entering the buy phase with unused actions, buying something with unused treasures, and the resign button.
I don't think this is a good idea. Using Dogmas that will be shared is often a good move. Demands that do nothing, possibly, and Dogmas that will do nothing for you, probably.
Heh, the most funny censor was on MtG Gatherer site. It was very strict, and would censor even if a swear word is in another word. But the fun part was that there were actual MtG card names, that were censored, like "City of Brass"
That must have had you all taking about the City of Bras.
They've also, later, made a Joke Card:
(It's not legal or anything, it's from a joke set).
A clbuttic mistake. Also known as the Scunthorpe problem. My favorite are news articles about buttbuttination.
I play Procession, then on the procession play a second procession. Then I play let's say two Caravans. What stays in play until the next turn? Nothing, or the first Procession? Obviously, I'll be drawing a card four times at the start of the next turn regardless.Nothing stays out, via the hard rules. For a brief time I ruled that Thrones that Throned Thrones that Throned duration cards stayed out, but I abandoned that in favor of following the rulebook as closely as possible.
From my understanding of the rules, the only cards that stay in play are durations themselves, and the cards that modify them directly, i.e. not the first Procession. But then I know the reason modifying cards stay out is to show you that they're doing something and to remind you. I would guess that the hard rules trump this, but, I'm not 100% certain right now.
Wait, why wouldn't the second Procession stay out? It was used to play/modify a Duration card, so wouldn't it stay out the same as a Throne Room?
If you use Procession on a Duration card (from Seaside), Procession will stay out until your next turn and the Duration card will have its effect twice on your next turn, even though the Duration card is trashed.
Heh, the most funny censor was on MtG Gatherer site. It was very strict, and would censor even if a swear word is in another word. But the fun part was that there were actual MtG card names, that were censored, like "City of Brass"
Before I go and read the rules, I always heard that it is very luck dependant.
Can someone say something about that? Is it a game which you are able to play competitively?
And if yes, dougz, will you implement a leaderboard?
Well, if Dominion wasn't developed, I believe another deckbuilder would have to take its place. Someone else would have gone: How can we make Magic better for people who don't want to spend gazillions of money (and still end up doing so with all expansions)?The reason I prefer Dominion is because that's what I was introduced to at the time. If I would have been introduced to Thunderstone or another similar game I might have been a fanboy of one of them and I would be posting this on thunderstonestrategy.com.
I don't believe Thunderstone would exist without Dominion.
I still feel the Goko level should be taken into account as well.
The reason I prefer Dominion is because that's what I was introduced to at the time. If I would have been introduced to Thunderstone or another similar game I might have been a fanboy of one of them and I would be posting this on thunderstonestrategy.com.
"Well, I gotta crap. Hopefully we can continue this later."
Doesn't sound that bad to me.
Ha, nice. It was a six-letter word, though.
At first I thought it was censored because of its connection to bodily processes, but after consulting Urban Dictionary, I discovered it can also be used as a term for a certain ethnic demographic. I feel a bit like Randal in Clerks II, although I'm guessing my usage of the term is still perfectly acceptable in mixed company.
EDIT: Ah, I might as well give it away before people start guessing off-color things. The censored word was 'boogie'.
...but I want to be ahead in the "get tunnels and then discard them" race, and I want to pick up my terminal draw right away while I still have a good opportunity. I'm planning on Warehouses and Cellars to discard the Tunnels, and those decrease hand size.
