Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - phyphor

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 [2] 3
26
If you just mean that I'm focussing on Simon, well I'd much rather lynch Simon than Silver or myself, which shouldn't surprise anyone.

You trust silver that much?

27
And yes, the vote on faust is indeed useless.

He reads as scum to me and he hasd as many votes as anyone who isn't me once I voted.

fixed in post!

28
And yes, the vote on faust is indeed useless.

He reads as scum to me and he has as many votes as anyone who isn't me.

29
You also wouldn't necessarily mind being counter-claimed, at least not if the PR to counterclaim you is the cop.

There is no way for the cop to counter-claim me, only if the cop and the other PR did so which would be eminently foolish.

Even if I were scum then it wouldn't be worth both PRs making themselves a target just to kill one Mafia.

(And I'm under no illusions that telling you that, or making this statement itself, lends any credibility to my claim one way or the other.)

30
So I get now that this is talking about fakeclaims. It is totally disingenius because of course scum knows that there are only 3 possible setups.

Let's pretend I'm Mafia. I clearly could not be the Rolecop (as claiming Tracker would make it trivial to counter-claim) but either of the others still has a 1/3 chance of being counter-claimed. That's the odds you need to consider not whatever nonsense you wanted to make up about how likely I might be to claim in a desperate situation.

This is rather rubbish. Phyphors sentence was cryptic and they seem to continue wanting to be pretty enigmatig in their style. That's fine but to accuse someone being scum for misunderstanding there is really farfetched.

I started off cryptic with the hope that I could get a read from people but when that hope was quickly dashed I opened up very quickly.



The point is that it's more pro-town to just claim, expecting everyone debating voting you to immediately deduce everything is dangerous for the town win condition, meanwhile there is a 100% chance scum will figure that out over the night. You have everything to lose and nothing to gain by being cagey about this stuff.

Not "debate me" but I have the chance to deduce at least something from the response. There would be some time in twilight for me to say who I was before dying, if necessary.

31
It definitely fits its playstyle though.

I will go to bed. Will be back before deadline, but not for a while.

Appear just to damn me, and then run?

Seems a little off to me.

32
The way I see it, there is exactly one way, and that is that you are a Tracker, so if you are, please cut the cryptic nonsense and claim it, and if you aren't, explain yourself.

I did.

vote: faust

In theory, were I lying, either a Town tracker, or Town Neopolitan would be able to know that for definite - which is 4/9 of the available set-ups (just under half, but still bad odds to make a bad claim).
A1 has a Neapolitan and a Roleblocker.

Yes, but there is no Neopolitan and Tracker so if there's a Neopolitan they can trivially counter-claim me. The point is that I am assuming that it will only take a scum jumping on the bandwagon to lynch me so I wanted to provide as much useful information as I can.


It means that Neapolitan never occurs with Tracker, so it's a valid counterclaim.

I'm glad at least one person here can read!


Here is a probability argument: For scum in phyphor's situation, it is probably good to fakeclaim. So say scum!phyphor fakeclaims 50% of the time. If phyphor is town, then the probability of it actually having a PR is just under 2/7 (or 2/6 if you yourself have no PR, or 1/6 if you do). So actually phyphor claiming increases the chance of it being scum.

If I were fake claiming then in 4 out of 9 set-ups there is a trivial way to counter-claim. The fact that you want to pull up nonsensical statistics to try to prove your point instead of looking at real facts would appear to say a lot more about you than me.


Ah, right... sorry. Still it makes zero sense for phyphor to not claim its role.

Which I did. I was seeing whether it was worth actually outright stating it because I'm used to towns that are able to deduce from more subtle information.

33
This makes things awkward for me because, having re-read the thread (and added a signature now, as requested), you are one of the players that made me suspicious.

Eh, so what? That doesn't make you scummier.

Because voting for someone who is standing up for me can very easily lead to you being a townie and me pushing for the death of an innocent, or you being scum and me being accused of throwing you under the bus to save myself.

It's never a good look!

Ok so we're not going to lynch a player who claimed, so how about we go back to simon?

What's the justification for Simon? I didn't see any wagoning for it to be "going back to".

34
OK, I'm not sure how to weigh my fairly strong scumread on you against the potential utility of a Tracker. It'd be nice if the vets could weigh in at this point.

If I am scum then lynching me is always good.

If I were vanilla town then lynching me is bad, but could provide information with regards how people vote..

I am claiming a town role, which ups the ante, but we are getting into the last stages of the day so we should vote and a bad vote still tells the town information. Yes, a tracker can provide useful information but that assumes I wouldn't be killed by the mafia anyway.

So, don't worry about the information a tracker can provide so much as when I flip town who looks suspicious and why?

35
I am saying, specifically, that we cannot be in an A setup. The only role that is only in setups B and C is Tracker.

If I am lynched then, when I flip town, you will know that I'm telling the truth and the other town role knows they can be effective every night.

Alternatively, I hope that by claiming this it will at least provide a respite. I know that only a Mafia would counter-claim and would definitely be lynched tomorrow for it.

In theory, were I lying, either a Town tracker, or Town Neopolitan would be able to know that for definite - which is 4/9 of the available set-ups (just under half, but still bad odds to make a bad claim).

36
  • If you have a power role, be very cautious about claiming it. If you're about to be lynched (and I mean intent to hammer, not a couple votes and feeling generally depressed and fatalistic), if you have a guilty result on someone as cop or tracker, if scum just claimed your role or your role makes their claim impossible, if someone you have an innocent result on is about to be lynched, or when it's the last day and it's Lynch or Lose (LyLo), then claim. Not before.
I am saying that, as I understand it, it's not possible for there to be a Mafia Roleblocker.

You should be able to deduce there are only two ways for me to know this to be true (if it is, indeed, true), and that I am, therefore, making a very particular claim to be a specific town role.

37
Are you claiming something? I honestly can't parse the first sentence.

Yes.

38
I also disagree with everything mcmc is saying. phyphor is the player that I want to lynch the least second to myself

This makes things awkward for me because, having re-read the thread (and added a signature now, as requested), you are one of the players that made me suspicious.

FWIW we should absolutely lynch someone today, because watching how voting happens gives us information for the lynch tomorrow, but I haven't seen a good enough reason to unvote.
I'd rather I wasn't lynched, obviously, and I'm not sure why the axe has started swinging back on to me.

As I'm at L-1 I feel I should say that, as I understand it, we townfolk shouldn't have anything to worry about the mafia preventing a town role from working. Which should make it clear what I am actually saying, and why lynching me is unwise.

I am not confident in my read of the situation with UncleEurope, but the person I have the most suspicion of is probably due to my biases even though I try to be objective about things so I'm not going to over-react just because.

I'm also likely to be up for several hours, if this helps, so can discuss further as necessary.

39
Oh, and add on the fact that you want me to provide:

actual content.

But not spend any time on it? Yeah, like I say, it's at best impolite.

40
The fact that they are now going to take some time (we are running out) and consider what everyone has said makes me think it will be more responding to current posts and not actual reads or a case. Pending more information I am happy with this vote.

We have more than half a day. Even if a player is real-world going to sleep so they wake up just as the in-game day is over we still have 5 hours (e.g. silver).

Pressuring me into acting fast is scummy, especially when one person asks me to:
 
read our game from the start and give us your impressions.

is at best impolite and, at worst, throwing me to the wolves.

I'm not going to simply turn round and vote for you for that, or because you've voted for me, I'm going to stick to what I said I'd do.


41
So I think uncleeurope’s misread of phyphor post it stupid but 100% believable.

Fair

As others have chimed in to say that my original post wasn't clear I'm more than happy to accept that the mis-read was a fail on all of our part, and I'm happy to accept that shifting votes constantly isn't necessarily a bad sign.

I'm willing to switch my vote - but I genuinely don't have a good scum read and unvoting immediately after a call for an early lynching would only make me look bad.

phyphor: why are you town?

Because that's what I was assigned to be.

It would be interesting and helpful, I think, if you coul read our game from the start and give us your impressions. Fresh eyes can help see new things.

Give me an hour or so to consider everything that's been said, and by whom.

42
(Pronoun issue: I think I'm going with a general they/them for almost everyone unless the player is well known by me since before. Hope that is ok with everyone.)

Epicene "they" is a catch-all pronoun and, whilst some suggest that refusing to use the correct pronoun and instead always using 'they' is bad I am not one of them.

Phy seems aggressive and not helpful.

I appreciate I appear unhelpful - but there's very little help I can provide as I am (a) new to this forum's way of playing and (b) entering the game party-way through a day and having to battle against that. I am happy to accept that not only am I appearing to be unhelpful I am not actively helping because there's very little I can actively do right now.

With regards the aggression, I appreciate and acknowledge your impression of me. I didn't believe I was being aggressive but I will endeavour (should I survive, which is currently looking likely) to moderate my tone better.

43

Phypor/muenstercheese have done absolutely nothing towny in their two posts.

What, precisely, would you like me to do on D1?
Here again is a proponent of the silly idea that D1s are pointless it seems. They are not. They are only if everyone is lazy and fails to do anything like you did. We have a good deal of content already. You might not necessarily find scum D1, but it is very common to have a bunch of solid townreads by the end of D1 if played correctly.

I didn't say they were pointless, I asked what you wanted from me.

I'm happy to join in with whatever is desired.

44
Why exactly do you think uncleeurope is mafia because he evened the votes out by voting for Faust. I strongly disagree that any vote at that time period was more or less likely to get a lynch through and we were not in a deadline scramble situation. So from the outside your reasoning looks flawed, and I would like you to flesh it out.

Because evening out the vote is a good mafia tactic because it does one of two things:

1) makes it less likely that anyone (especially your fellow scum) will be lynched (good for the mafia-wolves)
2) makes it so that if the voted for person does get the votes their way (whilst you're absent) there is plausible deniability when they turn out to be innocent.

If you can unvote then unvoting avoids (2).

In any case, there seems to be no good justification for Uncle to keep changing their vote.

45
Ahkay, so you didn't think I was scummy until after you voted for me. Fair enough.

You mean where I pointed out after you changed your vote to faust that switching your vote for no good reason made you look bad?

And that you tried to claim I was voting just to save my skin?

And now you're trying to claim I said you were scummy after my vote?

Either you're scum, and you're deliberately trying to muddy the water to save yourself, or you're a townie who chooses not to read what I've posted.

46
I feel like you are annoyed with us for not coalescing on a decision about who to lynch yet, but it seems to me that we still had a fair amount of time (Wednesday at 5 am, right?) so this is out of tune with the rest of the conversation. The vets don’t seem concerned yet, and I’m following their cue. It’s also unusual considering that two new players just joined and Umbrage has been otherwise engaged.

It also seems like you are annoyed with us generally and your long post seems unnecessarily aggressive. I’ve been a work, though, so that could just be how it strikes me. You’ve offered little and now your chastising us for not asking more and some folks being confused about an early wagon or no lynch statement.

Would you care to share some of your previous experience? And do you have any reads on folks upon rereading other than trying to join a wagon that is not you?

I am not annoyed at the lack of coalescing, none of us even need to vote yet, after all, only that deliberately adjusting votes so that there's no clear majority, instead of just unvoting, is a bad tactic.

I'm not annoyed, I just wanted to respond to the messages that I'd not interacted with. I appreciate that annoyance can be perceived, but that wasn't my intent.

As for my experience - I've played various incarnations of Mafia/Werewolf on forums going back over a decade, have run various in-person games, and play quite a bit of One Night Ultimate Werewolf (although that's a very different style of game). I've played with various different roles from "no special roles", "just a seer", to some ridiculous games the silliest of which had about 100 people and it felt like half of them were special roles.


I am still perturbed by the fact that some people appear to have deliberately mis-stated my reasons or voting, focusing on one half of my statement.


47
Do you think I am scum, or are you just trying to save yourself with this triangle voting business?

1) we have agreed that it is good to lynch someone on D1
2) you have constantly changed who you're voting for, after we agreed that, such that we are unlikely to reach a consensus without actually giving a good reason why your'e changing your vote.

That is scummy.

You and your cohort trying to make it about me protecting myself even after I literally just explained my reasoning for the second time makes you look even scummier.

48
Ah, I’d assumed [it] was a vet because [they]’d played before and started spouting  “we have to do this or else no lynch” kind of stuff like he knew what was up. My bad.

So how comes you can understand my "we should do this because not lynching is bad" but others seemed to think I was saying not to  lynch / changing my vote to avoid a lynch?

49
In general we want to lynch every day, but whilst Day 1 is a day with little information which makes it hard to do a good lynching if we don't lynch anyone we run the risk of having the Mafia take out the good townies (be it because they're good at Mafia or have had to role-claim to save their skin).

It's unclear if you mean that a no-lynch D1 is good or not. It's very much NOT good to no-lynch here. Sure, due to the little information we have it's likely we are hitting town, but the information the lynch is gathering is key to have a useful D2. Without a lynch we are doomed to repeat D1 only with fewer players left.

Maf will most likely kill out the best/towniest town players by their NK no matter what we do. Scum has not that much influence over our lynch though, which is why it's so important to use, also in D1.

What you've done here is throw doubt on what I said, where I was very clear in that in general we want to lynch every day, and then re-stated what I said they'd do as if it were new information.


2) it/its

Wait, really? I don't have a problem with that but it strikes me as so unusual that I want to make sure you aren't joking.

I don't joke about pronouns. They aren't a joking matter. And, yes, the correct pronoun for me, someone who doesn't have a gender, is "its". The pronoun "it" has been used to dehumanise people because of the implicit assumption that all people have a gender, but I assume most people here are enlightened enough to recognise that this isn't necessarily the case.





Then phy comes in with the goal of not lynching anyone while putting me at vote #3. Super aggressive way to not kill someone. His initial post just struck me as odd, and I get the feeling that would be the case regardless of who he voted for, but I am willing to admit that defensive bias might play into this. I dunno, phy just doesn't sit right with me. And this confusion is ultimately why I went with cube first.

No, phy comes in stating that I want to kill someone that isn't me. Although you and Simon appear to want to collaborate on making it seem like I said something else. Not only that you choose to misgender me so, yeah, I'm keeping my vote on you and, assuming I make it through the night, Simon tomorrow at this rate.


I agree on it (its pronoun choice...sigh) being weird out of the gate and the “it’s gonna be a no lunch” and saying zippo about it’s experience. Super strange to me, but not sure if it’s scummy yet.

I didn't say "no lynch", I merely outlined why some people argue against a D1 lynch, but that I think it's a good idea.

I was asked if I had experience, I said yes. If you want to know more then ask me. I don't believe lying as a townie (which I am, but we'd all say this) helps the town.

Also, can we stop with the passive-aggressive sighing at my pronouns, thanks?

Phypor/muenstercheese have done absolutely nothing towny in their two posts.

What, precisely, would you like me to do on D1?





Vote: Uncleeurope

Partially to save my own back, but also because setting up three of us to share the votes (by switching to Faust) means we are unlikely to lynch on Day 1.

In general we want to lynch every day, but whilst Day 1 is a day with little information which makes it hard to do a good lynching if we don't lynch anyone we run the risk of having the Mafia take out the good townies (be it because they're good at Mafia or have had to role-claim to save their skin).

This is a terrible vote. Phyphor tell me why you think uncleeurooe is scummy.

I don't know how to make it clearer. Someone switching votes to keep us at 3 seemingly to avoid lynching someone is a bad tactic If they switched for a reason then that's fine, but this didn't appear to be the case.




Another point against silver is his interactions with phyphor/muenstercheese, who I think we all agree have only been scummy in their brief time here.

I'm scummy because?

Oh, wait, you said "Being concerned with self-preservation first and foremost is a pretty big red flag."

EVen though I said that was partially the reason and provided a better reason. But nice of you, and others, to skip past what I said, right?




Actually phyphor is also a newbie.

Here, yes, but not in general (as I said before).


50
phyphar replaces muenstercheese, effective immediately. I can’t do a vote count until evening

Welcome Phyphar! Standard questions: Any previous mafia experience, preferred pronouns and most importantly.. are you scum?

0) LaLight can't spell - my name is phyphor
1) Yes
2) it/its
3) no


Vote: Uncleeurope

Partially to save my own back, but also because setting up three of us to share the votes (by switching to Faust) means we are unlikely to lynch on Day 1.

In general we want to lynch every day, but whilst Day 1 is a day with little information which makes it hard to do a good lynching if we don't lynch anyone we run the risk of having the Mafia take out the good townies (be it because they're good at Mafia or have had to role-claim to save their skin).

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 18 queries.