151
Feedback / Re: Username change?
« on: January 06, 2017, 05:43:29 pm »Unless the name is taken, you could always just make a new account.
And lose that wonderfully high respect ratio of his?
Unless the name is taken, you could always just make a new account.
For me it was the fact that after one of the updates it simply stopped working on my computer. For some time playing with older version worked , but then it forced to update and I was out of online Dominion.
In fact, why not have a single box that toggles between KEEP and EXCHANGE, instead of two boxes, where clicking either toggles the state of both boxes? One box has entirely redundant information, and only adds to confusion.
It used to work that way, but other people found it confusing. Actually, with the single box format, some people wanted the box text "Exchange" or "Keep" to represent what would happen when you cleaned up, and some wanted the opposite! (i.e. you would click on a box that said "Exchange" to make the Traveller be exchanged, though the box would now read "Keep"). Part of the opposite desires came from people wanting consistency between the multiple Travellers interface and a single Traveller interface.
I agree that it should be more clear which of the two options is currently selected.
That kind of begs the question of why you have an avatar at all.
Okay, how do you have such a large avatar? I need to know.
We've talked about this before, but ...
Dice Dice Math Dice
Dice Math Dice Dice
DIIIIIIICE Math Dice?
Is this how I use math to beat my friends at D&D with dice?
I don't know about D&D, but it is true that...
The expected roll of a D10 minus 1 is equal to the expected roll of a D8. (5.5-1=4.5)
The expected roll of a D6 plus 1 is equal to the expected roll of a D8. (3.5+1=4.5)
The expected roll of a D6 plus 1 is equal to the expected roll of a D10 minus 1. (3.5+1=5.5-1)
But you can't really say that a roll of a D6 plus 1 is "as good as" a roll of D10 minus 1. What "as good as" means depends on the situation!
Deja vu. You should be able to calculate things like this yourself now.
Math Fact: Having equal means is not enough for two random variables to have identical distributions.
Look, I know lots of math.
Rats!
I don't know that much math, but I am learning.
Wow! Look at all this math I know! Way more than you ever need to know.
Also, I super enjoyed the military service in general and I applied for an extension but it got rejected.
In general, what can be intended as "I'm slowly teaching you layer by layer of Dominion omitting more complex cards at start" can unintentionally be viewed as "I'm not allowed to play with all the cool stuff" from the part of the newbie.
http://gokosalvager.com/static/logprettifier.html?https://dominion-game-logs.s3.amazonaws.com/game_logs/20161103/log.0.1478154547781.txt
"Hm, no way to trash starting cards and no +Cards? There's Possession but eh. I'll just gain lots of Ports and a few Processions, gain a ton of Distant Lands, and figure it out later."
I did and it appears I only have one game against him, which I lost; so my memory is failing me here; I thought I had played more against him and at least won some games.
2) I'm pretty sure it's grammatically (and logically) correct to use singular with "each".
Well apparently it went Stef 4-2 Polk5440
It occurs to me that Stef could have been reading all of this advice as well. Maybe we should have been sending PM's to Polk instead (Iet it be known that I am only being half-serious here).
Bring lots of coffee so he can't lull you to sleep.
Go with classic Bobby Fisher. Bring a cigar, blow smoke in his face.
Keep track of all moves and deck states in a spreadsheet that you keep on the side so you can always makes the best-informed decisions.
The thing I find most frustrating is that if I were explaining it to a new player, what I'd say would be "You may discard two cards, and if you do discard two cards, then you get two monies" which is exactly how the cards used to be phrased.
It's a new card. This is the only way it's ever been phrased.
In new Dominion terminology, "for" and "to" mean that you must have actually successfully done the thing to get the bonus. Pretty simple.
I think you know what he meant. That concept used to be phrased differently. It's even changed on the 2nd edition versions of old cards.
"If you do", "for" and "to" are not defined in Dominion terminology. Nowhere in any rulebook are those defined. Sure, you can read the card FAQs to find what the words mean on that particular card, but that doesn't mean that you know what similar words mean on all other cards. And it doesn't mean the card text shouldn't be as clear as it possibly can be (given space requirements). So "do x to get y" should be clear (at least as clear as "do x; if you do, y") in a vacuum and without reference to any "new Dominion terminology".