Or it may be better to throw and catch errors.
importantly, there shouldn't actually be any bm cards, as in, you should not be able to look at the kingdom and estimate how many turns it would take to get 4 provinces, or anything simulatable like that.
It makes all sorts of expected value calculations unexpectedly easy.
point salading
It's the best feeling when you kill Tirion, then drop an Acidic Swamp Ooze.
I think it feels better when you just silence the Tirion.
Or Harrison Jones.
Oh yeah, I just love the feeling when I silence Harrison Jones!
Just pulled a Mysterious Challenger out of a pack. The only secrets I have are Eye for an Eye, Get Down, Pally-Snipe and Sacred Trial, though.
They'll multiply if you can play them multiple times per hand, or just play and then return to hand, though.
If you mean cards in deck then you can only multiply by removing something from play, either to hand or in some Malorne type way. You can get multiple copies of a minion in play with one copy in your deck, but you can't get multiple copies of the card in your deck just by playing it a lot, even multiple times per turn.
If you mean cards in deck then you can only multiply by removing something from play, either to hand or in some Malorne type way. You can get multiple copies of a minion in play with one copy in your deck, but you can't get multiple copies of the card in your deck just by playing it a lot, even multiple times per turn.
How can you play a card a lot if you don't remove it from play somehow?
They'll multiply if you can play them multiple times per hand, or just play and then return to hand, though.
Oh and the diversity of cards seen from older sets has gone up too with Discover and I guess Reno. I've seen a bunch of Warlocks using Twisting Nether (8 mana destroy all minions) for example.
We can't help it, the animation is just too cool. The not dying thing's pretty good too.
I think I disenchanted my golden Twisting Nether way back before Naxx or around the time of Naxx. Never got another one
Oh and the diversity of cards seen from older sets has gone up too with Discover and I guess Reno. I've seen a bunch of Warlocks using Twisting Nether (8 mana destroy all minions) for example.
Back to Renolock.The T's disappear because we know exactly how many there are, so we're choosing 4 times from the distribution (P, 1/5), (K, 1/5), (X,3/5). This should already make us suspicious of 2/23 as the denominator of our answer should divide 625.C# agrees with me that it's 2/23.
Three sets of outcomes are consistent with the observations: PPKP (which can appear 4 ways), PPKK (which can appear 6 ways) and PPKX (which can appear 12 ways). So the probability is (4x1 + 6x1 + 12x3)/625 = 46/625 = 0.0736. I think.
What answer does your C# give?
The implementation could be wrong I guess, that's why I posted it. But I don't think so.
I think you're probably right that the Ts just disappear from calculations, but I wanted to do it with the Ts for completeness.
The 23 denominator comes from the 46 you've got there. You've summed all the possibilities that are consistent with observations; so now you need to divide the probability of the exact thing you want (ie. 4/625) by the probability of the set of consistent outcomes (ie 46/625), to get 4/46=2/23. This is pretty much exactly what I'm doing in my proof above, it's just messier because I don't remove the Ts (or collapse the factorials, for clarity).
