1
Dominion General Discussion / Re: What is Your Rule of Thumb for Comparing VP Tokens to Victory Cards
« on: February 18, 2017, 12:55:56 pm »
Here is what I am getting at:
Are you finding that you view landmarks as more important or less important than you did when Empires first came out? I can say for certain that I have found them to be more important than I originally thought. For example, a landmark like Labyrinth, which gives 2 VP if you gain a 2nd card in a turn, means that I will gladly use an extra buy to take an unwanted copper to get those 2 VP. The fact that I can trash the copper, keep the 2 VP, is very nice.
The other thing I am finding the more I play Empires, is that Temple is a really strong card. Its #20 on Qvist, and it would be one of the cards that I predict moves up on that list in the future. Do you have a number of tokens that gather on Temple before it is a must buy?
Thanks
Are you finding that you view landmarks as more important or less important than you did when Empires first came out? I can say for certain that I have found them to be more important than I originally thought. For example, a landmark like Labyrinth, which gives 2 VP if you gain a 2nd card in a turn, means that I will gladly use an extra buy to take an unwanted copper to get those 2 VP. The fact that I can trash the copper, keep the 2 VP, is very nice.
The other thing I am finding the more I play Empires, is that Temple is a really strong card. Its #20 on Qvist, and it would be one of the cards that I predict moves up on that list in the future. Do you have a number of tokens that gather on Temple before it is a must buy?
Thanks