reinoe : please calm down. Hystrionics like "he claimed scum" don't do well here, this isn't mafiascum, we don't enjoy shouting at each other.
Here's what I think of the TA/reinoe situation :
TA didn't speak a lot in the neighborhood because he thinks neighborhoords are of dubious utility to town, I'm pretty sure he's said this in previous games, and there is a very specific precedent on f.ds of scum using a neighborhood to successfully manipulate town (Robz in M31).
Do you think I'm trying to manipulate TA in the neighborhood? Did you see TA's content that he's not even contesting? If anyone is trying to manipulate it was him trying to manipulate me.
I don't think TA put a lot of weight in the whole husband/wife thing because he doesn't know the flavor and kinda ignored it, which is a mistake in RMM but whatever.
So you admit he made a mistake?
When TA said "as soon as I got my role PM", he obviously wasn't referencing the flavor, he was referencing the neighborhood and the fact that he's suspicious of them because you don't know the other guys alignment which means you should be careful. You might disagree with his decision to basically not engage, that's fine, but it's not"claiming scum" and I'm pretty sure you understand that and are just being super-hyperbolic because that's fun for you.
And as scum he could just as easily not be engaging as an excuse to prevent me from getting a read on him. It has nothing to do with being fun for me: it has everything to do with TwistedArcher claiming scum. Get into his head: not contributing, not interrogating me in the neighborhood, not scumhunting, complaining about the neighborhood getting outed even though he never brought it up in the neighborhood and pretending he can't see any reason for claiming the neighborhood all speak to a dishonest mindset.
What kind of people claim "I can't see anything good that's ever come from poor people/Russia/Mexicans". TwistedArcher is lazy when it comes to this game at best and speaking from a dishonest perspective at worst.
It's dumb though. Because this case is obviously extremely weak, yet you present it as if we're all idiots for not lynching TA, so where's your credibility now ? When you later make a better case, there's nowhere left for you to go, and no one will listne to you, so great job there.
You're pre-emptively trying to justify excusing TA's obvious scum behavior. And I see a lot of sheeping/borderline RVS voting still taking place. Maybe I should propose a plan that I don't explain that involves lynching TA to see what happens people will hop onboard.