Dominion Strategy Forum

Dominion => Rules Questions => Topic started by: pingpongsam on June 07, 2012, 08:13:13 am

Title: Noble Brigand vs Lighthouse
Post by: pingpongsam on June 07, 2012, 08:13:13 am
Apologies if this topic has already been covered...

See this gamelog: http://councilroom.com/game?game_id=game-20120606-163522-1e6ebf3b.html

On 21 Weeks' Turn 9 he begins the turn by playing a Lighthouse.

On my Turn 10 I buy a Noble Brigand which manages to trash and collect 21 Weeks' Gold. Now, I thought this was interesting but then...

On my Outpost Turn 10 I play the same NB from the reshuffle and 21 Weeks' Lighthouse makes him immune to the same attack.


Should Lighthouse protect on NB gain and play?
Title: Re: Noble Brigand vs Lighthouse
Post by: BubbleBoy on June 07, 2012, 08:25:11 am
Lighthouse specifically says, "when another player plays an attack card." It says nothing about gaining. So Isotropic was correct.
Title: Re: Noble Brigand vs Lighthouse
Post by: pingpongsam on June 07, 2012, 08:36:42 am
Dominion is so pedantic 8)
Title: Re: Noble Brigand vs Lighthouse
Post by: michaeljb on June 07, 2012, 04:03:05 pm
Dominion is so pedantic 8)

On that note, Noble Brigand doesn't attack on gain, but on buy.
Title: Re: Noble Brigand vs Lighthouse
Post by: Schlippy on June 07, 2012, 04:37:14 pm
Note that this is true even for real reaction cards.
You are not allowed to reveal (standard) reaction cards when someone buys a Noble Brigand.

The exception to this are Watchtower and Trader when you do not reveal any Treasure cards and gain a copper, because these do not react to an attack but to the gaining (Watchtower) and "about to gaining" (Trader) of cards.


Same thing with the curse from Ill-Gotten Gains.
Title: Re: Noble Brigand vs Lighthouse
Post by: pingpongsam on June 07, 2012, 08:37:39 pm
On that note, Noble Brigand doesn't attack on gain, but on buy.

Yeah, I learned that lesson the hard way quite some time ago.

When I first started playing on Isotropic I realized how horribly wrong I had been playing IRL.

Occasionally something like this comes along to remind me my immediate reading comprehension must be lower than the tests indicated.