Okeeee time for schaddddddddddd:
First thing is lots of posts. This should be fun. Although it is actually pretty easy to read given how short his posts are.
People schadd has voted for: pps, IDPTG, eevee, joseph, eevee, dylan,
People that have voted for schadd: pps, Andrew, eevee, Robz
As for his actual posts, I already said there wasn't a lot f scummy content when I did my reread on him Day2. That changes a bit now that we know Andrew was scum. But there wasn't a whole lot from Day1 or Day2.
Day 1:
I remember not loving his vote on Joseph (well frankly everyone's) but in his case I am now seeing that previously schadd gave a null read on Joseph and that he wanted to go check Joseph's scum games. But just a few posts later he votes for Joseph, but doesn't mention that when he actually votes for Joseph. Like it was just convenient. schadd seems to be willing to go and check on previous games, but didn't in that case. So that makes me suspicious, but I kind of feel like I a barking up the wrong tree. This feels like how I felt about Dylan where my points on him ended up being more nitpicky than they were actual scum hunting. So I dont' know. I guess I don't really get a read from this.
Day 2:
says the scum team is bad. Self referencing?
There is a fair amount of hedgy content about Andrew. Playing a good middle ground there.
Promotes the Dylan wagon (can't remember who he was voting prior to this. Eevee maybe? And then joins at L-1, but basically admits that he doesn't have a reason to do so or not do so. This looks opportunistic.
Day 3:
Starts out comparing Andrew vs mcmc to ash vs mcmc as town vs town. But doesn't really give a reason to explain why. Well actually says he will look back and see, but starts out trying to paint Andrew as townier. And starts out with voting PPS, who (you guessed it, Andrew ends up voting for). I see a trend here.
Then, like I noted before schadd says he is going to go over each person over the weekend. In the meantime, Andrew is at L-1 or L-2. schadd's first big "reread" is coincidently on PPS, who he votes putting him at 2 votes with Andrew. I know that schadd responded to this already, but I do see a narrative of schadd feeling like he had to get something going on PPS to stop the momentum on Andrew.
And yes, he does end up giving rereads on almost everyone, so I have to give him credit for that along with an interesting back and forth with Andrew toward the end there. Andrew says to stop wasting his time. Is that hinting that he wanted schadd to hammer him?
Day 4:
Like I said before, the biggest thing I am wary of is that everyone and their pet lizard want to vote schadd. That doesn't mean we are wrong here, but it does make me nervous.
At this point I would rather vote for schadd than Robz. But maybe at this point it doesn't matter and they are both mafia. They make more sense than schadd-Eevee/schadd-PPS/schadd-WW or Robz-Eevee/Robz-PPS/Robz-WW. Out of those other six options I don't know which one would be most likely. Maybe Robz-Eevee or schadd-Eevee. Mostly likely not schadd-PPS, and frankly the WW pairings are just there to be thorough.
I think I need to do an Eevee reread next.