Translations:
----------------------------------------
Wandering Beggar
+2 Cards
At the start of your next turn:
+X$ per unspent $ at the beginning of the last clean-up phase, of the Player to your right. (it actually says 'player to your left' on the card, as we play in counter clockwise turn order)
My recommended wording:
+2 Cards
At the start of your next turn:
+ equal to the unspent the player to your right had on their last turn.
thanks for the improvement, I'll implement it in the translation.
4$ Action - Duration
----------------------------------------
Tradesman
+1 Buy
+1 $
At the beginning of your Clean-Up phase, you may spend 3$ at a time to get 2 Coffers.
3$ Action
----------------------------------------
The english wording is kinda clunky, so if you have any improvements, please let me know.
Am I correct in assuming that for Tradesman, if you have >=, you could spend twice to get a total of 4 Coffers, and if you have >=, you could spend three times to get a total of 6 Coffers, and so on? Because if so, I would recommend this wording, as it's more in-line with how it would be worded as an official card and is simpler (also, the horizontal line should be omitted, see Improve):
+1 Buy
+
At the start of Clean-up, you may pay any amount of for +2 Coffers per paid (rounded down).
You are incorrect, the intention is to only allow increments of 3, in order to prevent the Wandering beggar to be obsolete as soon as other players buy the Tradesman.
But using the tradesman you can limit the Wandering beggar to +2$.
| |
|
Split Pile Top Half | Split Pile Bottom Half |
Translations:
----------------------------------------
Wandering Beggar
+2 Cards
At the start of your next turn:
+X$ equal to the unspent $ the player to your right had on their last turn.
4$ Action - Duration
----------------------------------------
Tradesman
+1 Buy
+1 $
At the beginning of your Clean-Up phase, you may spend 3$ at a time to get 2 Coffers.
3$ Action
----------------------------------------
Updated english wording.