Here is the post that EFHW snipped from:
In it, I highlight ashersky's completely normal reaction to my case; he saw exactly what I was doing, voting for a case that made sense to me but was weak by virtue of the game just starting. My reasons for voting Twisted weren't gambit-fake, but I did try to be controversial with the
way I voted, to maximize reactions to it.
I explained already how EFHW's reaction is odd (my snipped post above); she looked at the situation, and somehow, based on who looked scummy to me in a past game, reached the conclusion that my vote was a bus. Because, according to EFHW, even shraeye couldn't believe a case like that. This really looks like she is looking at the facts from a very particular perspective, trying to make sure that at least one of shraeye/TA comes out looking scummy.
Later on, you posted the most logical explanation, and said that you hadn't thought about it, but wanted to include it just to be fair. I think that really looks like somebody who realized how scummy their first post was, and tried to mollify that later on.
4). Shraeye could be content to post a weak case as though it is strong b/c it is day one and all we have so far. I'm not sure what I think of this option, but thought I should add it to be fair.
She kept changing and making up facts to try to stick it to me, during our exchange, and now that she sees that my point is getting through to other people like spiritbears and theorel, she decides to shift tactics and paint me scummy by saying that I "avoided" something which she never even asked me to do.
Vote: EFHW