I re-read Galz, and while it hasn't exactly solved the game for me, I do think he's on the town side of null at least. I may even have read him with a slight scum bias when I was considering his three-person wagon and wondering what everyone else was seeing.
My comments on his early interactions were that they seemed carefee enough, and that he was engaging with a lot of different people. At #311 I noted that he made another post about fluff posting, which I think took him over the amount of time I'd spent being frustrated at it, and yet I seem to be the one Robz is giving scumpoints to for that.
There was a whole thing with Galz accusing Robz of scummy buddying, and other people playing the is-it-town-v-town game. I foudn the weirdest bit of that the post where he emphasized that their back-and-forth is all tongue-in-cheek, while also acknowledging that it doesn't read that way to the rest of us.
I questioned whether he was over-explaining his joining of the Joth wagon at #491. He was only pushing Joth to X-2 for the first time.
He moved to a phase of pushing MiX hard over the scummy MiX-Chairs dynamic, voting MiX for a while, then changing his tune and sitting back on Joth's wagon.
By the EoD, he was promoting a town!MiX and town!Chairs scenario, and was pushing a scum!Robz and scum!Joth theory.
Given that Joth flipped town, and the Robz-Joth thing was meant to involve a partner element, I would have expected his scumread on Robz to tail off a bit into D2, but now he's saying Robz is still up there, along with Chairs again now and Isis.
I find Robz scummy most of the time by default, and I agree that Chairs is where votes should be going. So all in all, there's a bunch of stuff that I don't quite get exactly about Galz's play, but I think his ideas are more aligned with mine than not. I'm not super-interested in voting him today, especially if Chairs is still on the table.