So, here's what I've got:
Pro/Con UoS:
--I had a towny read on UoS to begin with (Pro)
--claimed Cop first (Con)
--delayed claiming (Con)
--newbie mistake not realizing we'd won already (Pro - go see MX for when I did the same thing)
--checked EFHW (Pro)
Pro/Con Jimmmmm:
--I had decided last night that Jimmmm/nkirbit was the scumteam (Con)
--claimed cop second (Pro - second claimant is almost always the real one)
--suggested we lynch a cop, not nkirbit (Pro)
--started the PM quoting thing (Con)
--checked EFHW (Pro)
I believe nkirbit lost the game for his team though, by his reactions to both claims. The thought process for scum NOT killing me (which was my plan, btw) was that the Cop was just too dangerous. I made sure they were thinking about that by posting my big theory post before D1 ended. Laying out the 50% chance of doom for them was pretty good for that, I think.
If scum had killed the Cop N1, we wouldn't be in this situation. Now, scum would have planned for this situation right? They had to think the Cop would claim. So one was going to fakeclaim, no matter what.
We have to assume nkirbit is toast here. He didn't counterclaim UoS, and Jimmmmm has since claimed. We also have to assume that whoever is the partner was selected during the Night to claim, which is why nkirbit didn't counter UoS. He was either playing into the fake claim, or waiting for Jimmmmm.
So, I think we have to gauge nkirbit's reactions to find the real cop.
When UoS claims, nkirbit votes, fights a bit.
When Jimmmmm claims, nkirbit gives up and says nonsense about EFHW.
Now for some quotes...