@PPS: interesting analysis to say the least... but
1. I hoped I've expressed clearly enough why I played as I did. I am fine if you saying it is some play that deserves attention... but I do not agree in any way that it is a consistent play as mafia. To fake claim there under those circumstances without painting a specific target serves no purpose.
2. me-galz pair... well, that's an interesting conspiracy theory. I actually have thought whether this is a possible scenario to others yesterday. As much as I liked it... it is just implausible. You can put WIFOM there... but if we are a pair, it is just so much better for us to stay low and lynch either YN or manda today. This interesting act can be performed tomorrow, with the better flavor (if the cop didn't appear yet) that I fakeclaim cop and accuse galzria. That is a much much more effective play if we both are scum.
I hope now you can see how we play differently.
I try to find scum using mostly motives, reasoning, and likelihood. I do not judge based on the attitude people say things. In M6, I still find my early suspicion on ehunt/cayvie justified. It is just unfortunate that somehow the early death on the Cayvie wagon does not reveal scum. And while your confidence that Galzria is telling the truth from his attitude in that game is indeed correct, you doctoring him actually does NOT help the game that much. Actually if he was found dead along with Ozle, the situation would have been clearer to town, and we wouldn't have to waste a lot of time discussing whether he was lying or not. You can see that toward the end game it did not really matter whether Galzria is dead or alive. (And not to mention that actually your play would make a lot more sense if you were the SK and Glooble was the last member of werewolves... it is fortunate for us you were not)
Thing is, we were still discussing a lot whether Galzria is lying or not lately in that game. This is because it is logical to view how he plays as scum, and he has every motive to play like that if he is scum, and we cannot really rule him out however candid he is, just as theorel said when he is dying.
Here it is similar. You can have a gut feeling that my secrecy is strange. Or Galzria is candid. That is fine. But IMO the important thing here is: whether you believe in my explanation of my play or not, it does not point toward a specific player. Galz is not forced to refute my explanation. Even suppose that objectively you assess that my explanation and Galz's are equally likely (which I do not agree but just for the sake of the argument), a generic townie would have no reason to make a strong case on one side. What he has said about his logic does not withstand scrutiny. The only reason I can see him saying such things is that he is scum.