Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[fontisian]

We haven't seen Haddock, Hydrad, Fontisian or Liopoli yet.


Guys?

Actually, liopoli has been around and made some pretty sweet points earlier.

[Roadrunner7671]

We haven't seen Haddock, Hydrad, Fontisian or Liopoli yet.


Guys?

Actually, liopoli has been around and made some pretty sweet points earlier.

I know, that's why I fixed it.

[gkrieg13]

Vote: Roadrunner7671

I'm sort of feeling that, but from his meta it seems like a bad idea.

I agree with this here.  He seems very well within his meta here.

Was Roadrunner7671 "well within" his town meta in the below post? (you appeared slightly perturbed):

I misread ADK's post but I'm not gonna unvote.

Wait what?

He hates voting so him leaving his RVS vote is well within his town meta. We have mislynched him way too many times recently

[Seprix]

vote: Melisandre

Vote: seprix for repeatedly voting for people trying to get us out of RVS.

@A Drowned Kernel - I still don't understand this: tell me why "repeatedly voting for people trying to get us out of RVS" is scum-indicative?

Putting pressure people who express strong opinions early is good for scum- they get to have an opinion without putting themselves at too much risk, and it can put people who are trying to scumhunt on the defensive. There's a scum motivation for doing what Seprix did.

Wait a second here.. This is not a great opinion at all.

vote: ADK

Houston, we got one!

[A Drowned Kernel]

Man, that was my real reaction looking at Seprix's post. If it looks "fake" to you I don't know how to argue against that, sorry.

[A Drowned Kernel]

vote: Melisandre

Vote: seprix for repeatedly voting for people trying to get us out of RVS.

@A Drowned Kernel - I still don't understand this: tell me why "repeatedly voting for people trying to get us out of RVS" is scum-indicative?

Putting pressure people who express strong opinions early is good for scum- they get to have an opinion without putting themselves at too much risk, and it can put people who are trying to scumhunt on the defensive. There's a scum motivation for doing what Seprix did.

Wait a second here.. This is not a great opinion at all.

vote: ADK

Houston, we got one!

What's wrong with it?

[Roadrunner7671]

What's the case?

[Roadrunner7671]

Wait I started this wagon.

[A Drowned Kernel]

What's the case?

People don't like the reasons I voted for Seprix, far as I can tell. They seemed like fine reasons to me at the time.

[Seprix]

Yes, yes, OMGUS post because you voted me, whatever. I said the excuse already, and it's not the reason.

Putting pressure people who express strong opinions early is good for scum- they get to have an opinion without putting themselves at too much risk, and it can put people who are trying to scumhunt on the defensive. There's a scum motivation for doing what Seprix did.

It feels like you're trying and looking hard for some good reason to curtail what I'm doing. Why are you so worried about people getting pressured? What if the people putting the pressure on are scumhunting? And what if the people calling for that to stop are scum...?

Seriously, this 'reason' for me being scum just feels like you're trying to find some justification to vote for me.

[Seprix]

This is crazy. Seorix, you need to chillllllllllllllll

No, this is good.

But wait, you're okay with the pressure going on here... But you're not over there.

[Seprix]

How inconsistent, ADK. Care to explain?

[J Reggie]

Seprix, I'm agreeing with your case on ADK. It's basically what I was thinking but couldn't put into words. vote: ADK.

And with that I bid you goodnight.

[A Drowned Kernel]

Man, I'm not even voting for you right now, Seprix.

I felt a certain way when I read that post. I gave my reason for that vote. Maybe it's a bad reason! It felt right at the time. I've since changed it, and since changed my read on Seprix, so that's not even relevant at the moment.

[Seprix]

Vote count?

Basically, the problem I have is this: You suddenly changed your read on me as I apply the pressure on you. You cracked. If it didn't work out like that, you would have kept your original read, and you know it. You never mentioned that you were changing your opinion on me before. Seems weird to suddenly bring it up now.

I like my vote. I say ADK is as good a D1 lynch as any.

[A Drowned Kernel]

Vote count?

Basically, the problem I have is this: You suddenly changed your read on me as I apply the pressure on you. You cracked. If it didn't work out like that, you would have kept your original read, and you know it. You never mentioned that you were changing your opinion on me before. Seems weird to suddenly bring it up now.

I like my vote. I say ADK is as good a D1 lynch as any.

I changed my opinion on you when you were having your discussion with Melis. About when I made the "this is good" post I think.

[liopoil]

Umm, are there any scum!Seprix games I can look at? Because, well, usually acting different than normal is a red flag. And his posts came off a little like he was artificially picking a fight. Scummy.

What's with the ADK votes?

[liopoil]

-Roadrunner votes ADK because he misunderstood the post (later moves it)
-SS votes ADK because he disagrees with the post (later moves it)
-Fortisian votes ADK because he thinks the post is fake
-Seprix votes ADK for explaining himself (Seprix was building up to this for a while...)
-J Reggie sheeps Seprix

These are not good votes. ADK's post made sense to me.

[liopoil]

How inconsistent, ADK. Care to explain?

Calling those posts inconsistent is a stretch at best. I mean, I guess it's totally possible you're just mistaken (with some confirmation bias), but my guess it that it's at least a little manufactured. Vote: Seprix

[Seprix]

Umm, are there any scum!Seprix games I can look at? Because, well, usually acting different than normal is a red flag. And his posts came off a little like he was artificially picking a fight. Scummy.

What's with the ADK votes?

I haven't played any Mafia games in a long time, probably over half a year. I'm playing like this in the other current Mafia game I'm in, but of course that game isn't close to over, so you can't really use it for reference either.

[Seprix]

-Roadrunner votes ADK because he misunderstood the post (later moves it)
-SS votes ADK because he disagrees with the post (later moves it)
-Fortisian votes ADK because he thinks the post is fake
-Seprix votes ADK for explaining himself (Seprix was building up to this for a while...)
-J Reggie sheeps Seprix

These are not good votes. ADK's post made sense to me.

Excellent, excellent. I like disagreement. I like this. If nobody fights a potential lynch, it's either obviously scum or we're doing something wrong, and I don't think ADK is 'obviously' scum, just very likely.

[2.71828.....]

vote: Seprix

[fontisian]

Sher locks like a good lynch to me.

[Hydrad]

I have arived!

Why is there like 5 pages of posts already! I missed RVS!

also. Totally forgot that I had signed up for this game I got my message. We will se how this goes.

First thoughts.

Hey we have some championship guys here. Thats pretty neat. This should be a fun game.

Seprix feels like a new person. But I don't think hes played for a while so maybe he just changed a bit? still weird.

Vote: Awaclus for now though.

[Awaclus]

Officer Duty reporting for booty.

It's also possible that he's communicating something to his Mason partner or Neighbor.

Vote: Awaclus

Prepare to die, rolehunter.

Let me explain the joke (because when you explain a joke, it makes it funnier).

There was a game in which Roadrunner was the scum Rolecop. In that game, he agreed with the other scum to start the next day by saying "Hi everyone!" if his Rolecop result was a Roleblocker, and then it was a Roleblocker so that's what he did. Now, whenever he says "Hi everyone!" (which is all the time), people sometimes joke around by suggesting that he's trying to communicate something to his partner again.