Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[shraeye]

But Archetype can roleblock the SK kill I think.

[Archetype]

I'm Roleblocking him tonight. Or Lekkit if sparky is scum. I wont specify which until tommorow (if I'm alive) to keep scum guessing.

[Archetype]

Ninja'd

[shraeye]

I'm Roleblocking him tonight. Or Lekkit if sparky is scum. I wont specify which until tommorow (if I'm alive) to keep scum guessing.

I'm not sure I see the point in keeping scum guessing who gets roleblocked.  Maybe I'm not considering all possible scum roles.

[Archetype]

I'm Roleblocking him tonight. Or Lekkit if sparky is scum. I wont specify which until tommorow (if I'm alive) to keep scum guessing.

I'm not sure I see the point in keeping scum guessing who gets roleblocked.  Maybe I'm not considering all possible scum roles.

Just in case of some funkyness. It shouldnt matter either way.

[Axxle]

Well I don't see any reason to hide this anymore, Cuzz's weird claim and Archetype's stubbornness might get much too many town unnecessarily killed.

I'm the Ten of Wands, Doctor
I protected Insomniac night 1, protected Galzria Night 2, and plan on protecting Ashersky tonight.

I thought my fakeclaim might have given us an easier time, but clearly not.

[ashersky]

Man, just caught up, and saw Axxle's claim.  Clearly don't want to lynch him first, whether he's lying or not. 

I'm okay with voting sparky, but what's the vote count?  I don't want to derphammer. 

Who should I investigate tonight?  One of Cuzz/Lekkit/Axxle, I imagine?

[Galzria]

Can I get a refresh on the CARDS claimed by Cuzz and Sparky?

[Galzria]

Can I get a refresh on the CARDS claimed by Cuzz Lekkit and Sparky?

Fixed.

[Lekkit]

Me two of swords. Sparky six of cups.

I actually believe Cuzz has the right info. I did lie during my claim. I am the oftenmost not very usefull FBI-agent. I hoped scum would claim that role if it was "available". Im actually the nine of swords. I targeted yuma night 1 and Archetype night 2. However istead of Sk/not sk I got no result.

[Lekkit]

And, with that: Vote: Sparky

[Axxle]

that's L-1

[Lekkit]

Hmm... Unvote

[ashersky]

No thoughts on who to investigate?  I could clear Axxle, I guess, and then follow the seer until we find the last WW, (assuming it isn't sparky)?

But it seems everyone was lying?  And Lekkit claims he was roleblocked?

[ashersky]

So Axxle's reason for lying seems better than Lekkit's...hiding the doc makes some sense.  Sparky has had more time to plan his excuse, I guess...

I may or may not be around in the next 12-18 hours...should I vote and put Sparky at L-1?

[Lekkit]

Sparky was the primary reason as to why I claimed VT. Not saying much day 1 and then stepping it up after most of a faction has been eliminated night 1 seems a bit suspicious to me. And now this makes sparky my top scumread.

[Axxle]

WW will try to kill seer, SK will try to kill FBI. Which is more dangerous?

[Axxle]

Or they might try to kill me or conf town.  This is hard.

[ashersky]

WW will try to kill seer, SK will try to kill FBI. Which is more dangerous?

Clearly I want to live.  And Lekkit could be lying about his role, given he lied already.  That applies to you, of course.

If sparky flips anything but VT, I think we have to trust Cuzz's info.  If sparky is SK, clearly protect me.  If sparky flips WW, protect Lekkit.  If sparky flips mafia...Lekkit is probably going to investigate you.  I can investigate anyone town prefers.  You should probably not say who you will protect in that case between me and Lekkit for wifom purposes.

[ashersky]

Also, I will keep checking in tonight as long as I can, and will wait to vote sparky until I know I won't be able to check again.

[ashersky]

Alright, close to turning in here, so I will place my vote: sparky now.  No ones weighed in on investigations lately, but I will check the thread in the AM.

As for Roleblocker, I don't know if Axxle is lying, but I know Arch felt sure he was the SK and may roleblock him.  That would be good to be clarified.

[ashersky]

Oh, one last thought/question: how sure are we about the mason claims?  Unconfirmable, obviously, but believable, I think...just looking to hear how sure others are.  I think I am comfortable with it.

[Lekkit]

Roleblocks, doctorings and investigations should probably not be announced beforehand. It's better not to present the wine to scum to play with.

[Lekkit]

And actually, I think I want to verify Cuzz' claim. I'm fine with being a possible lynch tomorrow as I feel like town is doing pretty good right now.

Vote: Sparky

[Cuzz]

Yeah, I thought this might happen since it's the only reasonable defense. I even thought about giving people one last chance to tell me if they lied during their claim before I came out with my info. But I didn't because......

1. The massclaim was taking a long time anyway

2. They might have caught on to what I was going to say and changed their claim then causing more confusion and

3. It's a MASSCLAIM. The point of a massclaim is to catch scum by helping town solve the setup (ideally). There is possibly reason for town to fakeclaim at L-1 with a PR as Robz tried and failed in XIV, but NO reason for town to lie during a massclaim. That's terribly anti-town. 

The idea that two of the people I just fingered as scum happen to have violated point 3 above is too convenient. They're both scum. But they really have no choice I guess.