That being said one last thing - What do you make of the fact that they never like... did anything? This is to say they went out of their way to try to assumedly set someone up (for being online or whatever), but then never used that set up. Not even as a last ditch effort.
I think that is probably getting too far into tbh... but since you seem to of looked at it to the extent I have looked at it - does that ping you as like just crazy weird?
I don't understand what you mean by that
Allow me to elaborate!
1. Skum!Jo (making it a thing like ScarJo, just go with it) jumps to a wagon putting it at L-1.
2. My opinion is they were looking for a mistake hammer from Town, Space thinks the other end, but ultimately it does not matter... because it didn't happen.
3. K. So then he jumps off the wagon and starts the whole nonsense ish of "player was online that did not hammer".
So 1-3 is the set up. It is a set up, almost unarguably now that we have both their flips, that SkumJo intended to try to paint someone red for not hammering (or possibly paint Scola red at least for not being hammered).
I am not saying that that concept should make a whole hell of a lot of sense...What I AM saying is... that pretty much has to be the reason. It is such a fishy thing to cling to (person online vs not online) right after they did such a fish thing... the play was to use it... but he never actually accused anyone of it - he just said "someone was online that didn't hammer".
As mentioned - not a case for anything - just a rabbit hole. But it is interesting imo. Hope that helps.