yup
the thing is i would have had to choose to use it n1, and i think there is compelling reason to believe i wouldn't have if i were sk. the way gkrieg put it:
Schadd, if you had investigation immunity one night this game, and were trying to be the last person standing, which night would you have used it on?
my goal would be to survive for, in this game, 5 days if i were sk. gkrieg was able to investigate twice, within reason he could have done a third one as well. i would want to use investigation immunity the night i would most likely be investigated, if at all.
fortunately i already laid out my opinion on who one should cop (again, essentially the same as detective in terms of whomst to target) in NM10 (abridged a bit here):
-in theory, you would actually want to cop someone whom you think has a 50% chance of being scum, maximizing how informative the result is; if there happens to be someone you are absolutely sure is scum for whatever reason, copping them doesn't actually tell you much. in this case you are, uh, allowed to fake a guilty result but most people would say this is ill-advised.
-it is also helpful to cop someone whom you think is difficult to read - in this game, i would think this is TWM (he has had quite good results as scum, twice) and some people may also think this is me, space or awaclus.
so. in an objective sense, come night 1, i think i would have seemed a little less than 50% scum for most people: i defended against the lynch of a townie, and pushed the lynch of a scum (granted, someone who wasn't revealed to be scum during n1, but somebody who would have probably looked bad to most people given how the end of the day turned out). difficult to read, you could maybe make the argument but i would hold that i am at least less intimidating than many of the people here: twm, same as i mentioned in NM10 (2 recent scum mvps, also he just looked weird from the end of the day); robz, also at least 2 scum mvps that i can remember since his return, and strong scum play in general; faust, 2015
scum player of the year; gkrieg, runner up for
2016 scum player of the year; eevee and andrew have both done pretty well as scum recently (i personally lauded both of them for such in m96, andrew was also mvp in m97)
etc etc. i have played scum twice on site, one i won because the setup was rather scum-favored (RMM37) and one that i lost (M87. i was incidentally copped n2.)
granted gkrieg said i was hard to read but that was in addition to something else i don't think i could have reasonably predicted he (or whoever) would choose to cop me for
why investigate me n1? you don't have to answer
Maybe after. You seemed like a good person to investigate. Hard to read, and people had opinions about you.
and that was kind of surprising considering he correctly townread me early on in M94, the last game we played together, at a point where that wasn't an especially popular opinion (i did end up getting lynched d1, granted with 6 people defending me but gkrieg was very early on that train). his choice may have been colored by the fact that i had been scumreading him rather ardently for reasons i refused to say at the time (l0l)
so, there it is. i don't think i would have been innately good to cop, for that reason, and at d1 i didn't seem especially scummy by the gamestate, which may not have been true in later days, so i don't think it would have been a good idea to use investigation immunity n1 if i were sk. which means that i think that gkrieg would have had a guilty on me if i were sk. which means i am pretty sure i'm not sk. and maybe you can also come to this conclusion!