How is it inevitable? Lynching me is good. If we're not lynching you we should be lynching me. But lynching you is better. Even after we lynch you there's got to be more scum though. A 2-man team doesn't make any sense and neither does your play if you're alone. Lynching scum before PRs is better. A 1-v-1 with one scum on it is good for town, absolutely. But it's not a meaningless decision to decide which of us to lynch first.
Well, inevitable might be an overstatement, but town is going to be in an incredibly good situation if we lynch you first, because the combined information from your flip and our investigations will be most likely enough to find out the remaining scum, and at the very least it will be enough to find out enough scum that we can find out the rest while we're lynching the ones we already found. There will also be enough time to lynch every scum even if you're town and one of the scum is lynchproof. Town victory is all but guaranteed, regardless of your alignment.
The information from my non-flip is worth nothing, and your investigative power is a lot weaker than mine. Even after I finally flip survivor, that will be worth nothing. It will leave town in a fairly good position, but it's nowhere near guaranteed victory. Even if I flipped scum, the information would be less valuable than the information from your flip.
Basically, lynching you regardless of your alignment is about as good as lynching me only in the case that I'm scum.
The funny thing is that you're only arguing from your own perspective where you supposedly know that my result on you is wrong. You're not taking into account the information town will receive from your death. Why? Because you don't want town to actually get that information.