Well, what about the fact that my plan empowers 2 Houses instead of 1? And doesn't seem to ruin Targ empowerment down the line, as WW seems fine with the idea of Lannister dying in general.
it's a good fact. I do think your plan is better, there's not really an argument pro lannister.
I vehemently disagree. The only real advantage of his plan is that it takes less movements, and as shown, the difference is not really that big.
Just because Lannister base power is useless doesn't mean that the empowered version is too. And even if it is, we can just empty Lannister afterwards. Yes, we will have used more movements that if we emptied Lannister straight, but frankly people are overvaluing movement. So what if someone can't leave Stark/Targaryen? Definitely not the end of the world. The upshot is we get some sort of pseudo-investigative role. Seriously, I don't know how both sides are remotely equal.
Advantages of my plan:
1. Powers up the most explicitly pro-town House
2. Destroys the tricky-to-use House
3. Minimizes movement
4. Is the easiest to execute during the day (also nothing to sneeze at) today
5. Powers up the most explicitly anti-town House (but we get to see what the are) BUT
6. constrains the anti-town House - if scum tries to take the action, they're outing themselves
7. Maximizes targets for the pro-town House
Disadvantages of my plan:
1. Permanently destroys a House
2. Any conventional PRs in Baratheon are constrained (though this hurts scum too if they have a roleblocker or something)