Dylan continues to have logical, townie posts.
@Dylan, what's your scum narrative for Didds?
Also, Space, to your post, there are two big things I believe you are forgetting in your analysis that I think is why you are thinking I'm so likely to be scum. One is that I had a fairly long VLA through the middle of the game. Like a good chunk of D3 (I think it was D3, but time is weird). The second is that even before that VLA, during D2, I had roughly a week where I had that big work thing that pretty heavily restricted my activity. I didn't throw votes around like I have in past games because I just wasn't around enough to do that.
My comment was that you could believably be scum with multiple people because of your low levels of interaction. I was not forgetting that you reported a genuine reason for being away. I'm not saying you're more scummy-looking because you barely voted, I'm saying that you've left town with fewer chances to see anything not-scummy-looking in your voting history because there's so little voting history to look at.
I absolutely think Didds caught on to your post yesterday, and that's why ash was the target instead of you. If Didds could get you to vote me as your common denominator in your likely pairings, EFHW would be set up to hammer pretty easily without having to actually push very hard in any direction at all in case things turned against either of them. I mean look, up until the very end of yesterday, Didds was so dead set on EFHW being their strongest (only) scumread, but they never pushed in a way that actually moved any real momentum towards exiling EFHW.
Didds has been pushing EFHW hard all game. Can you show me any previous games in which scum!Didds does that sort of a tunnel on a scum-buddy? Or are you not saying here that you think the most likely pairing is Didds-EFHW?
I'm rapidly becoming convinced you are scum. I am not scum. The premise of this game is to find scum and exile scum. Of course you being scum doesn't inherently mean that I'm not, which is why I'm not trying to make that argument. My argument is that your push on me after I had been pretty strongly townread by I believe most people through the game once Space made that comment yesterday, combined with scum killing Ash instead of obv!town Space is a very strong narrative for scum!you.
Okay, do what the narrative. It seems like you’re saying that I’m scumming because I think you’re scummy. Who is my partner? EFHW is my most enduring scum read. Am I working with her because I keep voting for her but not convincing enough other people to follow? Or is it Joth? Who I could have followed to Ash at any time? Or Space? I don’t see how you are putting me in a pairing that makes sense abc that alone should give you pause.
Unless you’re scum looking for the easiest misexile in which case, you’re doing great. And that is why I suspect you.
Let me try to lay out the narrative for scum!Didds that I'm seeing right now, hopefully as concisely as possible. This doesn't quote evidence, but is just a summary of what I think has happened.
Didds has listed EFHW as her biggest scumread all game, but there has been no meaningful momentum towards that exile, despite quite a few people (including now dead townies) expressing either willingness to vote or suspicion of EFHW for most of the game. I need to go back and read to confirm the next bit, but I suspect the moments Didds mentioned the EFHW scumread were either moments where something else was hogging the thread's attention or they were done in such a way that didn't continue to apply pressure at any given moment (i.e. "my biggest scumread is EFHW, but since there's no interest in a wagon, I'll vote
XYZ instead"). That kind of read, while it clearly is taking a stand on the person, does little for actually moving town to vote for your scumread. For comparison, she and I have been pretty constantly putting pressure on each other today. I don't remember Didds doing at any point in the game towards EFHW. Yes, every day (or nearly so) she included them as the top scum in their reads and at times voted, but she didn't put the same effort into securing that exile that they seem to be putting in to exiling me today. That would be very strong partner play. You go into the end game as distanced as possible because of the "consistent" opposition, and in ELo when only a single misexile needs to go through, continue to say your partner is scum, but specify that the other person (the unfortunate townie) is the common denominator and should be exiled first. If you succeed in exiling the townie, you win. If you don't, you successfully exiled "your biggest scumread" and are almost assured of winning the 3 person ending on that towncred.
Because of this narrative, I do pretty strongly think the team is Didds-EFHW. I don't have a strong read on EFHW's play, so I'll go back and read to see if this makes sense at all from their perspective.
Actually, the same narrative kind of holds for Didds' play regardless of EFHW's partner status. Tunnel a townie all game, but then push a different townie as the common denominator at ELo, and give yourself two misexile options that you can push without looking bad. Meh, now that I typed it out the not-partner version isn't nearly as compelling, because that's just scum faking scum reads, and at that point you might as well just keep pushing your tunnel. For example, if Joth is scum and ash was still alive, that's exactly what people have described as what he would have probably done there. So if EFHW is not Didds' partner, scum!Didds makes less sense overall. So that either really raises the partner likelihood there, or it really drops it and makes EFHW-joth much more likely. I guess I really do need to go back and read EFHW next.