Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[O]

O can be O because he's O. TINAS, same thing but moreso.

Is it just me or does this hilariously sound like the first two lines of a F.DS Mafia limerick?

[Grujah]

This genuinely cracked me up.

[Galzria]

Generally.

But my intention here was to purposly jump the bandwagon.

Waiting for Pops to elaborate, but could see my vote moving here.

[Axxle]

O can be O because he's O. TINAS, same thing but moreso.

Is it just me or does this hilariously sound like the first two lines of a F.DS Mafia limerick?

I want to complete it, I'm currently failing.

[Galzria]

O can be O because he's O. TINAS, same thing but moreso.

Is it just me or does this hilariously sound like the first two lines of a F.DS Mafia limerick?

Unintentional, I swear!

[Axxle]

O can be O 'cause he's O,
TINAS, same thing but moreso,
Both play randomly
And later we'll see
If either is mafioso.

[Axxle]

Not great but... it's something.

[Galzria]

O can be O because he's O. TINAS, same thing but moreso.
Galzria has his confidence, Robz refuses to vote, to take a stance"

Is it just me or does this hilariously sound like the first two lines of a F.DS Mafia limerick?

[Galzria]

O can be O because he's O. TINAS, same thing but moreso.
Galzria has his confidence, Robz refuses to vote, to take a stance
Axxle wants to leave out humor, these damn games give me a tumor

Is it just me or does this hilariously sound like the first two lines of a F.DS Mafia limerick?

[Galzria]

*Ahem* Back to scum hunting.

Since I've been presented no reason to remove my vote, I'm leaving it on Pops.

[Voltgloss]

Fifteen people groggily awoke from a wine-and-cheese-induced stupor to find one of them, perhaps while unconscious, had scrawled a limerick on the Cellar door:

"O can be O 'cause he's O
TINAS, same thing but moreso
But pops is so terse
It comes across worse
And so on him votes we will throw"

Vote Count 1-3

Galzria (1) - Captain_Frisk
Insomniac (1) - popsofctown
Axxle (1) - SwitchedFromStarcraft
popsofctown (4) - Insomniac, O, Galzria, Grujah

Not Voting {8} - Robz888, theorel, Glooble, Tables, jotheonah, Axxle, Dsell, Green Opal

With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch

Players comfortable with a discussion quicktopic (11) - Dsell, O, Galzria, Captain_Frisk, Insomniac, jotheonah, Glooble, Green Opal, Axxle, Grujah, Robz888

[Glooble]

Ok, going to bed now (work at 7!) but a few thoughts first:

I'm finding pop's ultimatum's and refusal to explain things a little on the scummy side, but it also seems a bit obvious for scum play, especially from a veteran player. Axxle's analysis of SFS, on the other hand, resonates with me. It looks very much like "post enough to get noticed, not enough to make anyone notice me enough to get mad at me." - in other words, good first day Mafia strategy.

If I had to vote now, I'd probably go SFS. Fortunately, we still have a long way before the deadline. I would like to hear some more from SFS, if not convictions at least suspicions. It's odd that being too certain reads scum, but so does never being certain, but that's how I see it right now.

I'll probably be back around 3:30 - 4:00 tomorrow, at which point I imagine there will be 10 - 15 new pages to catch up on.

[Axxle]

"O can be O 'cause he's O
TINAS, same thing but moreso
But pops is so terse
It comes across worse
And so on him votes we will throw"

Convinced!

Vote: pops

Really, I just think that he's taking way to long to respond to our simple request of explaining himself.

[Axxle]

Unvote thought he was at 3

[Galzria]

Unvote thought he was at 3

Are you worried he will get hammered if he has 5 votes?

[O]

This thread... became so awesome.. so quickly...

@Axxle, 8 votes to hammer right? 5 is pressure but still not too too immediately dangerous

[Axxle]

I guess you guys are right.  My instinct about votecounts is slightly off because of how many people are in the game. 

Vote: Pops

[Robz888]

Okay, I'm trying re-trace the thread of how Pops got 4 votes. (I'm not saying he doesn't deserve them, but man, those piled in fast.)

If everyone could use the convention VOTE: PERSON, it would be easier to find them now. As it is, I don't see O's vote for Pops.

So, Insomniac voted for him, then Galzria jumped on, then Grujah jumped on (with no explanation), then O? When was O's vote?

I know Pops is an advanced player, and I wasn't taking his off-putting gruffness personally. Rather, I thought he had some strategic reason for doing it. I agree that he should explain it, and I understand that people are more liberal with votes than I am. But, bandwagon much? Grujah? Galzria? O? Axxle? (Again, I'm not certain about the timing of O's vote.)

[Dsell]

I'm weighing the idea of voting for pops. Trying to decide how likely/unlikely it is that he is mafia. It's pretty bandwagony already, and it's pretty early on. And I don't actually know how much information we would get by hammering him right now. However, I do kinda want to make a point, if nothing else. And I don't like AT ALL being told how to think or post or vote. I think I'm going to refrain for now but that may change in the future. I am just not at the point where I really suspect him yet over everyone else.

Pre-post edit: Yeah with Axxle's vote I feel ok not voting right now.

[Axxle]

It's town.  Lay off him.  Let's move onward.

Vote:Popsofctown for being Galzria-Confident on steroids, to the point of trying to stifle conversation.

[Galzria]

O's vote was about 4-5 posts before mine.

[theorel]

And, that's the whole thread.  Now for a quick post before bed...

@Pops: I didn't mean to say I wasn't going to read the thread (although I guess I did say IF...put it up to frustration at number of posts to read (especially because I couldn't read some while waiting for code to run at work because I couldn't get on f.DS))  The IF was more of a IF I read it all before I post.

Okay, the rest:

No one voted me for being silent?  I'm just not as cool as SFS and Glooble I guess...ah well.  It does mean that I can respond to every accusatory post, since no one really cares.  And, I guess I'll die night 1, since no one really cares...  Maybe this day will last a long time, slow down a bit, and things will change.

Things directed at me:
I played mafia IRL in college a few times.  I enjoyed it, but enjoyed more reading Mafia I and II.  I decided I wanted to play a forum game, since I haven't in some time...here I am with no forum mafia experience.

Quicktopic is totally fine by me

Hmm...Pops is at 4, so he's unlikely to be mafia...IMO too quick to build.  Of course Axxle was willing to push it further (from 3 to 4 also) nvm he hit it to 5.  Hmm...Draw your own conclusions, I don't think Pops is acting scummy.  The question is who's pushing the bandwagon looking for scum, and who's scum trying to jump on?

Wonder how many posts will be up by the time I read tomorrow morning?

[Robz888]

It's town.  Lay off him.  Let's move onward.

Vote:Popsofctown for being Galzria-Confident on steroids, to the point of trying to stifle conversation.

Got it. Because there was no space between the colon and the player name, I could not find it.

[Galzria]

I'm weighing the idea of voting for pops. Trying to decide how likely/unlikely it is that he is mafia. It's pretty bandwagony already, and it's pretty early on. And I don't actually know how much information we would get by hammering him right now. However, I do kinda want to make a point, if nothing else. And I don't like AT ALL being told how to think or post or vote. I think I'm going to refrain for now but that may change in the future. I am just not at the point where I really suspect him yet over everyone else.

Pre-post edit: Yeah with Axxle's vote I feel ok not voting right now.

It probably IS too band wagon for him to be Mafia, but I'm comfortable at 5, and will back down if he explains himself.

[jotheonah]

Ok, going to bed now (work at 7!) but a few thoughts first:

I'm finding pop's ultimatum's and refusal to explain things a little on the scummy side, but it also seems a bit obvious for scum play, especially from a veteran player. Axxle's analysis of SFS, on the other hand, resonates with me. It looks very much like "post enough to get noticed, not enough to make anyone notice me enough to get mad at me." - in other words, good first day Mafia strategy.

If I had to vote now, I'd probably go SFS. Fortunately, we still have a long way before the deadline. I would like to hear some more from SFS, if not convictions at least suspicions. It's odd that being too certain reads scum, but so does never being certain, but that's how I see it right now.

I'll probably be back around 3:30 - 4:00 tomorrow, at which point I imagine there will be 10 - 15 new pages to catch up on.

Axxle's? Dude, I was the one advocating SFS. And for the record, I still am. Mafia is not going to be drawing attention. We're looking for a pseudo-lurker.