why I think we should lynch EFHW today:
-lurking. I'm pretty sure she's still the lowest on the post count
-first to claim cop, encouraging others to do so too and so rolefishing.
-terrible reason for suspecting me: Right now my tentative scumread is Liopoil, because he hasn't unvoted or voted everyone else, like he said he would, and for the bit of hyperbole in his first post. Having a cop is great, but having one that can't be protected isn't super-awesome.
our cop is super-awesome. they should investigate scum and report back so we can win and stuff.
Also, scum got to talk during the confirmation stage. It would be good strategy to put a couple votes on some players when it was easy and then say "whoops!".
uuhhh what? no hyperbole from me. Our cop is super-awesome. being macho is not much of a nerf. it nerfs the doctor more really. Consider him just like a cop in a game with no protective roles. still awesome. If he could be protected than the cop would be super-OP.
-terrible reasons for suspecting sudgy: I'm finding sudgy scummier, actually, for declining the balance unique votes plan, putting Ash at L-1, and getting on the "UoS is tunneling" wagon.
declining the balance unique votes plan was the correct move, as it was a bad plan, as shown by sudgy. I showed in my other post why I think he's town for putting ash at L-1, and why in the world is finding UoS suspicious scummy?
Vote: EFHW
Whether or not people agree with my reasoning, I do not think these arguments and observations make me scummy:
Responding point by point as to .
1. I may have the fewest posts (though I doubt I do now), but I think you will find that I have responded to each issue that has arisen and participated actively, if concisely, in the conversation.
2. No one objected to the claiming cop plan, so to call me scummy now for participating doesn't make sense to me.
3. My pointing out your exaggeration was a
tentative scumread. I didn't vote you for it and I didn't try to make it into more than it was. It was an impression I wanted to put out there for others to think about.
As for the reasons for suspecting sudgy,
1. As I already said, he declined to balance the votes before you brought up any reasons not to. Both of you are also scummy for saying "I'll fix it later", when that might well be impossible.
2. His Ash vote might have been careless. It isn't enough alone to make me suspect him.
3. U of S was not tunneling. It was a conversation between the two of you clarifying what each of you was trying to say. sudgy's comment struck me as fanning the flames of the "UoS is tunneling" idea. It still does.
4. A reason you don't mention is his explanation for not balancing the votes, which is that unbalanced votes could make it harder to mislynch someone. This is not a good reason, as I said before, and the logic therefore seems contrived.
5. By voting and then unvoting Ashersky, he also gave him another unique vote, and maybe that was the intention.