Seeing as I think sudgy is scum, for the many reasons I have stated, I think it is irrelevant whether or not scum!robz would push a mislynch on town!sudgy. But if that were the case, as a general rule one for one trades(one town lynch followed by one scum lynch) are good for town and bad for scum.
why do you keep on putting ! after scum or town?
Its just something that the vets do and I started doing, I think the use for it is to clarify that scum!robz means the scenario where robz is scum, not I am saying robz is scum.
Seeing as I think sudgy is scum, for the many reasons I have stated, I think it is irrelevant whether or not scum!robz would push a mislynch on town!sudgy. But if that were the case, as a general rule one for one trades(one town lynch followed by one scum lynch) are good for town and bad for scum.
The thing is, if Sudgy is scum then he is kind of unskillful scum (sorry Sudgy).
Robz has just made flat-out statements without any argument to support them. As a newbie, I'd like his reasons spelled out so I can understand how he is seeing things.
Me, too. Is this usual Robz behavior?
First off, all scum is unskillful once they are caught, saying they can't be scum because that would make them dumb is never a good reason. I have seen vets go out of there way to look like obvious scum so that people will then be less suspicious of them.
Secondly, this one liner play from robz is something I have seen but have no idea what it means other than the fact that it is unhelpful and agravating. I would also like him to back up what he is saying about sudgy. Do you find him scummy for different reasons than the ones I have stated?
(Added after reading sudgy's reply)
I said my town read on him came from the fact that he lays low as town and tries to trap scum, this involves making a bad case and seeing who jumps on it, this also involves asking alot of questions and withholding his own reads.
I feel I have responded to each one of your point and I will again, I would like you to tell me if you think I'm flat out wrong with my defense or I am missing your point or you simply still find me scummy.
1. I have just answered this above, though this is not what you originally said, you first accused me of flip flopping my read on robz and you now say I just have a reason that isn't there. Also I would like to add this was a read from yesterday that was brought up today because raerae asked me to clarify, I do not emphatically believe robz is town he is not even among my top town reads.
2. I do not see why being on ever wagon is scummy please elaborate, jimm was also on the first too wagons of the day and stated support for the mail-mi lynch and he was town. I have made strong stances and have reasons for being on each of those wagons.
3. I said this yesterday and will repeat it, mail-mi was a much more informative lynch and was lurking just as much as robz and I had a reason, however small to believe robz was town.