I could not remember a single instance of faust/pubby interaction.
Heh check the first post you made in day 1. You told me my reads of Faust were all wrong.
Also shraeye, I don't understand the comment about me pushing for "hard claims", nor do I understand why you blindly support Awaclus but deride me for questioning him. Read the thread again. Here's a summary what happened:
Awaclus: If everyone mass claims volunteer it strongly helps town.
Pubby: I don't agree. Explain why.
A) I love it when the defense is scummier than the accusation.
shraeye: it's pretty strange that faust/pubby haven't interacted. it makes me feel like they are partners. (I say in a post that also claims 4 other people are his partners)
pubby: NO WE TOTALLY INTERACTED, 6 HOURS INTO THE GAME I SAID HE WAS SCUM, AND YOU SAID I WAS WRONG. (by the way, please don't notice that it was one line in a
big post, and that I completely ignored faust from that point forward)
B) Also, why are you charging up this language? "hard claim"? blind support? deriding?
B1) The Awaclus conversation was this: (actual quotes)
"I don't want to reveal everything that I know about the subject"
"Ehhh I think you need to reveal more."
B2) I'm not blind supporting Awaclus.
B3) I'm not deriding, I'm scumreading. It's different.