This is rather uncomfortable.
Look, suspicion on me, or anyone else, is perfectly warranted given what information we have. Nobody but me has seen my PM, so nobody but me knows for a fact what my alignment is. I certainly then can not condemn anybody for questioning it.
From any given town players' perspective, I very well could be scum leading the town along. So bring wary is reasonable. Shraeye's point (though he was long-winded with it, which I think, Eevee, is why you reacted so strongly) is that he thought he saw someone put forth the basis for a narrative that could explain actions through a spectrum of "Galz is scum". He's not throwing out baseless accusations, and for that I'm appreciative. If sometime wants to build a case on me, or feels it's warranted, then all I ask is for the narrative. Give me the story with the If's and Then's. At that point, feel free to let others judge it against other outlying theories. Seeing as there are only a handful of players (scum) who know what actually happened, it's to the benefit of town to not overlook possibilities.
Now, I would be very skeptical that someone COULD build a stronger narrative against me than other narratives that exist, but only because -I- know that I'm town. But I don't, and wouldn't, discourage people from doing so, especially if it gets them active and really parsing the facts.
@Shraeye, I believe if you go back and read Jorbles, he posited that Joth/Galz could be scum, where Joth came out today after (originally) Jorbles, and then Robz. He has since retracted the likelihood of that given all the facts, but if you wish to expand, I think that's where you would start.