A few thoughts:
-The Morgrim lynch should not have happened. His craziness MAY have been scummy for someone else, but it certainly wasn't scummy for him.
-The ashersky lynch should have been easier, and probably should not have required Walrus to counterclaim. I'm probably biased, but I really think I was making a lot more sense than he was.
-Robz said adamantly that Voltaire and Teproc were scum, but he also adamantly supported the Morgrim lynch and adamantly believed ash over me. I'm not saying that people should tone down their convictions, but possibly when you've been really sure about something and been wrong it makes it harder for others to trust your reads, whether or not they trust you.
-e was super scummy and would probably have been lynched if not for an even more believable claim.
-I was tossing up between investigating Teproc and Voltaire Night 2. The game would have been super different if I'd gone the other way. Something Teproc said about ash tipped me towards investigating him. Teproc, were you trying to get me to investigate you? If so, I did the exact same thing armed with a 1-shot Godfather in LotR 1.