Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Swowl]

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

Are you the reason I'm going to die tonight?

Yeah sorry buddy

[Swowl]

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

That's kind of presumptuous.

It would seem that way... but it’s actially not in this instance.

[Swowl]

Galz do you know if you die at beginning of the night or end of the night?

[Galzria]

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

That's kind of presumptuous.

Also, there's nothing logical to his statement. His read on me does not reflect my reasons on him in any way.

You don’t know that. In fact your next question contradicts it

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

Are you the reason I'm going to die tonight?

Yeah sorry buddy

One does not contradict the other - because my reasoning had nothing to do with bias, but entirely based on your action.

Also, now, either you're scum and town loses by not lynching you, like literally sooner than I can hit post on this message, or you're town and yay.

That said, as you're claiming responsibility then the main contention in my logic behind you being scum no longer holds. Doesn't mean you're NOT, simply that I don't have any unknown information to further my argument.

So yeah, ya'll can continue to look at Datswan after my death, but I've less of an opinion now than I did before.

[Galzria]

Galz do you know if you die at beginning of the night or end of the night?

I would guess at the end of the night, but I don't know for certain and I doubt Faust would tell me.

[Swowl]

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

That's kind of presumptuous.

Also, there's nothing logical to his statement. His read on me does not reflect my reasons on him in any way.

You don’t know that. In fact your next question contradicts it

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

Are you the reason I'm going to die tonight?

Yeah sorry buddy

One does not contradict the other - because my reasoning had nothing to do with bias, but entirely based on your action.

Also, now, either you're scum and town loses by not lynching you, like literally sooner than I can hit post on this message, or you're town and yay.

That said, as you're claiming responsibility then the main contention in my logic behind you being scum no longer holds. Doesn't mean you're NOT, simply that I don't have any unknown information to further my argument.

So yeah, ya'll can continue to look at Datswan after my death, but I've less of an opinion now than I did before.

Well next time don’t drag me unwittingly into your overly convoluted nonsense and we can avoid this stupid situation

[Swowl]

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

That's kind of presumptuous.

Also, there's nothing logical to his statement. His read on me does not reflect my reasons on him in any way.

You don’t know that. In fact your next question contradicts it

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

Are you the reason I'm going to die tonight?

Yeah sorry buddy

One does not contradict the other - because my reasoning had nothing to do with bias, but entirely based on your action.

Also, now, either you're scum and town loses by not lynching you, like literally sooner than I can hit post on this message, or you're town and yay.

That said, as you're claiming responsibility then the main contention in my logic behind you being scum no longer holds. Doesn't mean you're NOT, simply that I don't have any unknown information to further my argument.

So yeah, ya'll can continue to look at Datswan after my death, but I've less of an opinion now than I did before.

Also my comment on bias was based on your perception of my actions.

[Witherweaver]

Is the reason for keeping this under the hood over now? Can the details be claimed?

[Galzria]

Is the reason for keeping this under the hood over now? Can the details be claimed?

If he's scum, yes. If he's town, probably not.

[Galzria]

Is the reason for keeping this under the hood over now? Can the details be claimed?

If he's scum, yes. If he's town, probably not.

Helpful, I know.

[Witherweaver]

:/

[Galzria]

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

That's kind of presumptuous.

Also, there's nothing logical to his statement. His read on me does not reflect my reasons on him in any way.

You don’t know that. In fact your next question contradicts it

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

Are you the reason I'm going to die tonight?

Yeah sorry buddy

One does not contradict the other - because my reasoning had nothing to do with bias, but entirely based on your action.

Also, now, either you're scum and town loses by not lynching you, like literally sooner than I can hit post on this message, or you're town and yay.

That said, as you're claiming responsibility then the main contention in my logic behind you being scum no longer holds. Doesn't mean you're NOT, simply that I don't have any unknown information to further my argument.

So yeah, ya'll can continue to look at Datswan after my death, but I've less of an opinion now than I did before.

Well next time don’t drag me unwittingly into your overly convoluted nonsense and we can avoid this stupid situation

Actually, town!points for Datswan. Don't know why scum would have done what he did, knowing I was town. Seems more reasonable for town to take this route not knowing my alignment. I was dead anyway in a few days if I was telling the truth, and scum certainly wouldn't have thought I was lying. So there's that.

[Swowl]

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

That's kind of presumptuous.

Also, there's nothing logical to his statement. His read on me does not reflect my reasons on him in any way.

You don’t know that. In fact your next question contradicts it

FWIW I have Night reasons to lean against a DatSwan lynch at the moment.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 5 is neutral, 10 is confirmed town and 1 is confirmed scum, where does your result place him?

My {reasons} would place him at s 3.

Your reasons are bias. You have to remember i thought you were skum.

Are you the reason I'm going to die tonight?

Yeah sorry buddy

One does not contradict the other - because my reasoning had nothing to do with bias, but entirely based on your action.

Also, now, either you're scum and town loses by not lynching you, like literally sooner than I can hit post on this message, or you're town and yay.

That said, as you're claiming responsibility then the main contention in my logic behind you being scum no longer holds. Doesn't mean you're NOT, simply that I don't have any unknown information to further my argument.

So yeah, ya'll can continue to look at Datswan after my death, but I've less of an opinion now than I did before.

Well next time don’t drag me unwittingly into your overly convoluted nonsense and we can avoid this stupid situation

Actually, town!points for Datswan. Don't know why scum would have done what he did, knowing I was town. Seems more reasonable for town to take this route not knowing my alignment. I was dead anyway in a few days if I was telling the truth, and scum certainly wouldn't have thought I was lying. So there's that.

Time you had to live was a huge, like the determining factor, in my decision. Don’t really wanna speak to much to it if that’s cool, but yeah.

[iguanaiguana]

Vote:  Gkrieg

[iguanaiguana]

Actually maybe voting Jake is fine again? I mostly got spooked by swan voting him.

[Swowl]

Actually maybe voting Jake is fine again? I mostly got spooked by swan voting him.

So i actually like the Jake idea, but mainly i did it to see who would jump off.

[iguanaiguana]

Me!

[gkrieg13]

Life has been too busy. Witherweaver’s Stuff looks solid so

vote: Jake

I want to get a reread of Jake before the Day is over but might not get around to it.

[Swowl]

Galz - idk if you have this answer or not, but...

Based on your PR, Do you know which station Schadd bid?

[Galzria]

Galz - idk if you have this answer or not, but...

Based on your PR, Do you know which station Schadd bid?

Yes

[Galzria]

Galz - idk if you have this answer or not, but...

Based on your PR, Do you know which station Schadd bid?

Yes

Ditto for Space.

[Awaclus]

Request vote count

[Swowl]

Galz - idk if you have this answer or not, but...

Based on your PR, Do you know which station Schadd bid?

Yes

Ditto for Space.

Space is confirmed town, so they can always truthfully claim when they see it relevant.

Do you see a downside in divulging which station Skum had? Just for fake claim purposes down the road. Since their item went to you, once you are gone, we kind of will have no way of determining where they bid in truthfulness.

Given my "edgy image" at this point I can see how that request would come off as fishing. However, skum already knows the answer obviously, so unless I am missing something I think probably that would be a pro town play.

[faust]

Oh duh.

OK then, yeah, whatever his current power is must be able to stop a kill, unless you're going to respawn with some sort of power that with only two townies left will force your kill not to go through. Which I find much less likely.

Y'know, why not? This is obvious. vote: EFHW.

Vote Count 3.2

JaketheBaseballGod22 (6): Haddock, EFHW, Galzria, chairs, DatSwan, gkrieg13
gkrieg13 (1): iguanaiguana

Not Voting (7): ashersky, Awaclus, SpaceAnemone, 2.71828....., JaketheBaseballGod22, Dylan32, silverspawn, Witherweaver

With 14 alive, it takes 8 to lynch. Day 2 ends December 4 at 12:30 pm forum time.

[Swowl]

I am still 100% on board with the Jake lynch. I just need like a half day to think about something in case hammer goes through while I am sleeping or something. I will re vote tomorrow.

unvote