Theorel you may have mean this and I jus didn't understand, you said scum would want to spli up on town lynches but wanna all be on town lynches, but in multi ball scum has no idea if a lynch is on town or on scum so this doesn't really tell us much.
Yeah, that's what I meant by this: "Galz being on-wagon and scum means very little to me in multi-ball". Sorry if I was unclear. I stated the conclusion before the reasoning, and then provided an example to argue against the "scum would split up on this town wagon" idea, which would be typical play for scum in non-multi-ball.
HOWEVER, given that both kills were on wagon, I think it suggests that scum is slightly less likely to be on-wagon.
However, however, as noted by Jimmmm/Glooble scum in multi-ball for some reason likes to try to shoot the other team (fear of being NKed, I guess...). They might have targeted the non-them on-wagon figuring it was a good place to gun for scum. (I will note that M-VI showed how stupid of a strategy this is...which makes me conflicted, because 1 of 2 things happened: 1. scum is pursuing a bad strategy, and thus is benefiting town, which I want them to keep doing, OR 2. scum is not pursuing a bad strategy in which case we should assume they weren't gunning for the other team, and thus that we benefit from analyzing these for typical kill-reasons: i.e. WIFOM, PR-hunting, kill-the-persecutor, or eliminate strong town.)
Galzria makes sense in either case: he was scummy enough that I could see targeting him trying to hit other team, or trying to hit PR. He's known as a strong enough town player, that they could have hit him for being strong town.
raerae makes almost no sense in either case, unless it had to do with Jimmmmm/ashersky, or possibly shraeye/munch (if they were worried about her reading them better, but I doubt that reason personally as she had something approaching town-reads on them, and I think it's a generally bad reason. I mention it only for completeness).
However, (assuming raerae is the Mirror-Universe kill, which is a pretty safe assumption I think) whoever killed raerae must be partners with Galzria (or at least participated in discussion with Galzria about whether to kill her). Jimmmmm mentioned this already. I think in particular if raerae was killed for persecuting Jimmmmm for instance, then it behooves us to check Galzria for Galz-Jimmmmm interactions (I can't think of any off the top of my head, I can think of shraeye and Robz interacting with Jimmmmm but not Galz).
I guess I'll try to do that when I get a chance.