My problem is why did you shoot hockey? He couldn't have been scum because that would have made me scum and made it either another 2 person team, or a three person team, a two person team and three solo teams. I don't see the reasoning behind shooting him?
Also you said you knew that e was scum... Is this because you shot him or something else? If you knew he was scum, why did you shoot hockey and arch and not the confirmed scum in your eyes?
I didn't "know" he was scum, so much as I was absolutely SURE he is scum.
Like I said, I needed to confirm you two weren't lying (crazy things were happening). This could have been an epic backfire if both of them had been town...except, well, I could have just claimed anyway and won with whichever scum team wanted to use me.
As I've pointed out, third parties do whatever it takes to win. I put myself in the position to win either way, and I'm giving you the option to win. 2.7 gets the same option, of course, but I'm literally offering it to you.
You could hammer me and scum wins. But that isn't in your best interest. Or you could hammer 2.7 and we both win, together.
So was my choice to kill hockey strictly best for town? Probably not. It was best for me, though. You can hold that against me if you want, but it worked out for you in the end.