As far as morality goes, I just deny that this is a real thing. I think valence, which is how good any one moment of consciousness feels, is a real thing, and I think it makes sense to try to increase the valence in the universe. I personally try to do that. I think literally every other aspect of morality is a human invention and completely meaningless (except insofar as it correlates with valence, which actually it almost always does, so in practice a lot of morality tends to be great, but nonetheless I deny that it has any non-valence-related meaning).
This is quite interesting because I feel like this is the opposite of morality. A choice is only meaningfully moral insofar as it decreases how good a moment of consciousness feels for the person making the choice.
While it is possible, and indeed perfectly common, for a choice to reflect a benefit in a particular moral system that also increases valence for the actor, it is no more sensible to call this a moral choice than saying that bees are moral actors because through pollination they keep plant life going.
In that sense, biblical morality fails on the same grounds because it too ties its morality to an excepted positive outcome for the actor.