thoughts on the sudgy vote:
It all goes back to this statement
I realized, we can rule out all people saying the doc claiming is good of being the doc...
Now, this statement was either
1) Not well thought out because it clearly is not the case. Even then it was easy to see a doctor waiting 24-48 hours before claiming.
2) Scummy
3) Part of some brilliant plan to make a "controversial" claim and catch scum by calling sudgy out as scummy for making the claim.
I think we can rule out (1) because sudgy is a vet and I really don't see him doing this. Those people who voted for sudgy see this statement as (2) and sudgy clearly sees it as (3) and has thus begun a (small) wagon on faust.
Now, coming back and labeling his own claim as "controversial" rather than "oops I wasn't thinking right" is interesting. It almost makes me want to believe (1) but not quite. Now, I don't really see what is all that scummy about the claim itself so I will personally rule out (2). But that means I have to accept that it really was part of some grand plan, which I really don't like to do. (maybe I just haven't seen enough grand plans to recognize them sitting right in front of me)
So I am back to (1), which is merely to say that sudgy didn't really think the post through and made a mistake. Now what I do find scummy is going back and covering it up by saying it was "controversial" and not just a lapse. So,
vote: sudgy