Space, I will try to be more clear. If I have been confusing, it is a result of my inexperience, not that I am attempting to be shady. My role is that I can name a person in each phase and have a QT with them in the following phase. Additionally, during each of the night phases, the person that I monitor the person that I named and get a result of who they targeted. Of you, DatSwan, and Joth the only person who returned a result was DatSwan and her target was Ashersky.
I am not exactly sure what a motion detector is since its described as a monitor to me, but they sound similar. DatSwan had a bunch of questions like this, which led to the quoting of my role in my QT with him. I don't quite understand what I am doing wrong linguistically, but it sounds like maybe I am using a term of art incorrectly.
This does not line up with what WCD told me about her role in our QT. She appear to be claiming now that she tracks her target, in addition to getting both day and night QTs. That's ridiculously powerful.
Previously, WCD told me that she can target someone in any day/night phase, and have a private QT with them the next phase. If she targets someone at night, she said she also got a motion detector result on them. That seemed rather more believable.
This is a post from D3:
I monitored DatSwan last night. His target was Ashersky.
-- she explicitly said she monitored him and got his target, not that she'd talked to him and knew who he'd been intending to target.
I am not sure what the difference is here. In N2, DatSwan and I talked about who he should JK that night. He had it narrowed down to two people when the thread got locked, a few hours before the EON because of the rule violation. Before the end of the night, I targeted him for D3 got a result on him at the beginning of D3 Ashersky. No neighborhood opened, I am assuming because he was dead.
Combine that with the issue about what QT she'd quoted where, and I'm starting to get strong suspicions that there's a scumslip here:
I did not have chat N3. I quoted something from my QT with DatSwan and the repercussions were not chat ability for N3.
-- She's clearly saying that text went from the QT with DatSwan, not to DatSwan.
When I called her on this earlier this evening, she changed the story to:
I was penalized for quoting my QT in the Swan neighborhood QT.
Which is not the same thing.
Lastly, she's claiming that an infraction that occurred during a brief conversation in N2 (she said earlier that Swan had not noticed the QT for a while, and wanted longer to talk) was a delayed penalty that allowed her to use her role normally for D3 (getting the "tracking" result on DatSwan, and having a QT with him had he not been dead), but took away her QT ability the following night. That seems a bit weirdly delayed to me, when faust could just have denied her the tracking result, or the QT the next day.
I could just be be too paranoid here, because I really was townreading WCD for her overall behaviour, but I don't like it when the little things don't add up.
When I first wrote about the penalty I meant to say I quoted something from my QT "to" DatSwan. If the argument is about a mistake typing "with" instead of "to", then yeah, I made that mistake. I was trying to convey what happened with quoting anything else. And then I tried to clarify what happened more clearly so that it made sense.
I don't know why faust chose the penalty that he did. I can tell you that the thread was locked around 9:40 am and the night ended about 15 hours later (after midnight), so he spent some time thinking about it. I don't really know faust well enough to guess his thought process, but perhaps denying me daychat with a dead person wasn't enough of a penalty since it wasn't going to be productive anyway. Perhaps he could have denied my monitor result, but I already had the advantage of talking to Swan and having a sense of where who he was going to JK. Finally, taking the night chat is was less punitive than the day chat, so perhaps it was a punishment most fitting to the crime. I can say that it was oddly worded and had to be explained to me more clearly for me to understand that who I named D3 for N3, I would not get to talk to. It was a bit oddly delayed, but the reasons I just listed were how I made sense of it.
When I asked faust if I could tell the thread about the punishment, he said it was okay but that he wouldn't be able to comment on it. So, that is the extent of that. The quoting thing was a novice mistake, any confusion about my descriptions is my confusion. If I am using specific role words incorrectly, please try to understand my meaning. I am not choosing my words strategically.
I am ride or die with you and Joth. I know that you are both town based entirely on our interactions and I am not sure what has changed for you, but I am going to try not to let your paranoia cause me to rethink you. I have claimed more specific information about my role than anyone else, and you have some further information that has not been widely shared that should help you identify why I chose Joth for my neighborhood today.