If there's one thing Mafia II taught me ("what did we learn, Palmer?"), it's that putting ALL your cards on the table gives the Mafia an inside peek into your head. Galz and Robz took full advantage of that, and I'm trying to learn from my mistakes.
Add in your very NON Volt like thing to do of not analyzing every little thing before posting, and I grew quite suspicious.
Just because I didn't
post about everything doesn't mean I didn't
analyze everything. The problem is that analysis left me with a strong suspicion of jotheonah AND a strong suspicion of Robz. That suspicion was slightly higher for Robz - I stand by everything in my post, and am interested to hear Robz's factual rebuttal when it comes - but is high for jotheonah too. So what do I do? Is there anything I could do to possibly
test one of those suspicions?
Well, if I voted for Robz, he'd be at 4 out of 7. That's on the cusp of bandwagoning, but not likely to occur assuming at least SOME of the Mafia have voted. (And I'm guessing, as about 2/3 of us have voted, then about 2/3 of the Mafia have likely voted as well.) So - what if I lay out my reasons for voting for Robz (solid reasons), vote, and just leave it at that? Who will take the bait of pushing the vote up into real bandwagon territory?
Interestingly, the answer to that question was "jotheonah."
So there you go. Apologies for not being 100% up front crystal clear naive like I was in Mafia II. Burned me once. Hoping not a second time.
(Dsell: I still think your arguments are sound for all the reasons I've stated. The thing is, some - not all; but some - of what Galzria has identified re: jotheonah is resonating with me too. When I have time next I'll post at further length on that. But we now have more information; and that information now makes jotheonah MORE suspicious to me than Robz.)