Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Brightgalrs

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9
26
Could two neighborhoods have different chat restrictions? Sure, but keep in mind my main point is that no one has remarked on this for the last 100 posts.

Maybe nobody remarked on it because it wasn't very remarkable.
So far there's been only a handful of remarkable things. EFHW's strange extra vote. WestCoastDidds's nameclaim (and partial roleclaim). And then pubby's partial roleclaim.

"willful ignorance" indeed.

27
I can see several players here not caring about my reveal, but I would think surely the guy doing the calculations and trying to determine the setup would care about there being a second neighborhood.
I was just about to post about that:

One more question, is it night only? (since you could otherwise discuss now what to share)?

No, it’s always open. It has not been very active...

I'm in a neighborhood too but we only have daychat. It's unrelated to my role - I was invited in the middle of D1 by another player.
There is an apparent contradiction here, which I've highlighted in bold. And it's such an obvious one, that because no one else has picked up on it, I'm inclined to believe that it's willful ignorance on the part of the Bad Dwarfs. Like they're intentionally overlooking such useful ammunition because WCD is their ally.
Could two neighborhoods have different chat restrictions? Sure, but keep in mind my main point is that no one has remarked on this for the last 100 posts.
Unvote
Vote: WestCoastDidds

28
pubby (1): Brightgalrs
EFHW (1):
Ok so EFHW just has a standing vote. The question is when did that happen
The first vote count went like this:
MiX (1): Galzria
Joth (1): WestCoastDidds
Galzria (1): Awaclus
faust (1): mathdude
Awaclus (1): infangthief
Brightgalrs (1): Jimmmmm
So the extra vote was applied between the first and second count, meaning it was a day action that someone activated. And that timeframe was when both I and WestCoastDidds voted for EFHW. Something fishy there. Or... is this some extended rule I don't know about? like where being prodded makes you easier to exile for the rest of the day?

Still need to read the rest of the thread.

29
Our jotheonah, who art on forum,
Hallowed be thy name.
Thy mafia game come,
Thy will be done in thread,
as it is in QT.
Give us this day our daily vote count.

30
Let's get this cleared up
Can I Request vote count?

Also I was inspired by mathdude's du and de and made this:

31
Joth (1): WestCoastDidds
(From the first vote count)

I mean that wouldn't prove anything. You'd have to vote for someone else.
Vote: Pubby

32
It's not me
Unvote

33
Prodded already? I swear I checked yesterday and it was still N0. Sorry, I'll catch up.
My god... it worked! Or it was a coincidence!

34
Brightgalrs is town. Especially if that works.
I'm just guessing, it has nothing to do with my role.

35
Wake up: EFHW

36
Maybe EFHW is Sleepy (of the 7 Dwarves) and falls asleep every other day.

37
- Didds seems the most likely to pick a happy Disney dwarf or Smurf
- Joth seems the most likely to make the happiest dwarf the most evil dwarf
- Therefore Didds is evil
What a good theory.

38
Vote: EFHW only because they haven't posted yet. I want to hear their beautiful voice.

39
Still waiting on infangthief and EFHW to chime in, but considering some of us know each other pretty well, maybe we could discuss what characters we think others picked.

Like I know pubby, so I might have a theory or two about who he picked.

40
This "mathdude" dude hasn't posted yet, seems pretty suspicious to me.

41
Dwarfville
There's also the alternative spelling "Dwarvfille".

42
Actually Galzria, we played together in 2019 in Bad Idea Mafia.

43
/in

44
Mafia Game Threads / Re: BM27: Bad Idea Mafia (Day Five)
« on: December 11, 2019, 03:56:00 pm »
Brain tired.
Short posts now.
GG all.

45
Mafia Game Threads / Re: BM27: Bad Idea Mafia (Day Five)
« on: December 09, 2019, 12:01:42 am »
Bright, could Raerae be Alien who claimed to be Vanilla-ized after seeing the N2 Vsnilla-ized player flip dead at start of D3?
Yeah that could be possible. Roleblocking still can't come from her if that's the case.

But I'm ready to vote now.
Vote: Uncleeurope
Do what you want, a No Lynch isn't the worst thing that could happen.

46
Mafia Game Threads / Re: BM27: Bad Idea Mafia (Day Five)
« on: December 08, 2019, 12:21:47 pm »
Okay I figured something out.

Imagine LaLight is actually the roleblocker, and they lied about being a SK, etc. Who did they roleblock last night? Not Galz. mail-mi makes no sense. shraeye seems like an obvious pick, but that can't possibly be because where did the third kill come from? raerae and me are also options, but choosing to roleblock either of us over Galz or shraeye seems unlikely.

Because that line of thought is pretty weak, it points to Uncleeurope being the roleblocker.

I'll wait for Galz to get a word in, but I think I'm going with Eddie.

47
Mafia Game Threads / Re: BM27: Bad Idea Mafia (Day Five)
« on: December 08, 2019, 10:06:53 am »
Based on your analysis or Galz?
It's all based on what Galz says. And then me coming to the conclusion that Galz is likely not scum.
There's not too much to analyze on this other than that.

48
Mafia Game Threads / Re: BM27: Bad Idea Mafia (Day Five)
« on: December 08, 2019, 09:58:42 am »
Do we know there's a roleblocker or do we "know" there's a roleblocker based on the belief that Galz is telling the truth?
"Know". I can confidently say I don't know anything.

49
Mafia Game Threads / Re: BM27: Bad Idea Mafia (Day Five)
« on: December 08, 2019, 09:57:05 am »
Oh, then let’s lynch LL first.
Yep, part of me wants to.

Their attempted Night 1 kill I find still find so, so suspicious. There's two unclaimed kills, and they did neither of them? It makes perfect sense if they're really a WW/Mafia and pretending to be a SK.

Then there's the chance that LaLight actually is a SK, but they were never cured last night because of roleblocking shenanigans.

It's also suspicious that they were so gung-ho to lynch raerae, both before Galz revealed his investigation, and earlier when they didn't realize it was a choice between you and them.

On the other hand, LaLight has a chance to be scum and a chance to be Town while you have a chance to be scum and a chance to be a Survivor. The scenarios where LaLight actually is Town are happy and sunshine-filled, while the scenarios where you actually are a Survivor are somewhat grim.

And there's some plausibility-reaching if we assume LaLight is only claiming to be a SK. It's such a risky move to claim to be scum. There could've been an actual SK in the game (cough shraeye cough), who would've killed them immediately, thinking they were lying. The other remaining scum could've not believed them, killed them. Or mail-mi could've been lying the entire time. There would seem like lots that could've go wrong, and it might not have been too clear if the pay-off would been worth it.

50
Mafia Game Threads / Re: BM27: Bad Idea Mafia (Day Five)
« on: December 08, 2019, 09:34:18 am »
The problem is that forces another player to be SK, which can’t be Raerae or you, so it has to be Galz... which means Galz is lying.
Actually an additional SK isn't necessary explain the night kills since we now know shraeye was a vigilante the entire time.

So let me try and help you out here. Let’s say you lynch me and I flip Survovor. Who is your number one suspect?
It'd mean LaLight is the roleblocker, so them.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9

Page created in 0.121 seconds with 19 queries.