Splitting headache rereading this (and not from the theory talk
). Can't decide who I should vote for yet, all the cases seem pretty weak, trying to come up with somewhere I feel comfortable parking my vote or some better reasoning.
Nkirbit was leading the pack for a bit, still might be where I end up voting, based on his sudden shift to "well it isn't unanimous, guess we should have no plan at all then" after like 3 posts from Ash, and based on the vote that Shraeye pointed out a couple pages back.
But then Shraeye triggers all kinds of scummy feelings for me, although much of it may just be questionable logic, and at this time of night I'm having trouble separating scuminess from posts that just bother me in what may be a non-scummy way. (Lack of spellcheck==scum!, me putting in effort==scum!).
I think Robz is currently my top scumread though. First for his continually baffling example of that previous game in his first post, where he seems to mis-explain just about everything if I'm reading the followups right, and where he uses "We made a plan, then a bunch of complicated shit happened which didn't relate to the plan, therefore plans are bad.", for his voting Volt based of TA's minor-calling-out-of-Volt and then without further comment escalating that into him being "manifestly the scummiest player". He seems to bring up the Volt case a lot without expanding on it until
481 where he says there were a bunch of other examples without pointing them out. Also for ignoring me asking about this back in
395.
And dismissing Chairs' entire defense by calling it reasonable, therefore scummy in
517 is a nice way to keep pushing a potential mislynch without engaging in the reasoning in any way.
And as Ash points out in
521, Robz keeps saying that he sucks at being town. I think this could be a good way to push a mislynch and set us up not to assign too much blame for it later.
Okay, I think I've talked myself into it.
Vote: Robz