Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Robz888]

If the scott case is "he is lurking," I hate to break it to you, but scott has lurked in 100% of this games.

[Robz888]

* this = his

[azadin]

WW - why are you against the chairs lynch, here? His case is based around his overcompensation and wishy-washy posting. You called my "overcompensating behavior" (covering all my bases) scummy, so why not support the chairs case for the same reason? You seem to be oddly deflecting your attention from him, making me think you're pretty scummy yourself. I guess we'll see if chairs is lynched and what he flips.

PPE: 2

[sudgy]

I want to do stuff, but I don't want to leave because I want to see what happens...

[Witherweaver]

WW - why are you against the chairs lynch, here? His case is based around his overcompensation and wishy-washy posting. You called my "overcompensating behavior" (covering all my bases) scummy, so why not support the chairs case for the same reason? You seem to be oddly deflecting your attention from him, making me think you're pretty scummy yourself. I guess we'll see if chairs is lynched and what he flips.

PPE: 2

Because he was never overcompensating.. It seems like Ash kind of made that up.  And where was Chairs wishy-washy?

[Robz888]

I want to do stuff, but I don't want to leave because I want to see what happens...

Let's try this: Why should I move my vote off you?

[Teproc]

Vote Count 1.12:

chairs (6) : ashersky, mcmcsalot, azadin, EgorK, sudgy, scott_pilgrim   {L-1}
sudgy (3): A Drowned Kernel, Eevee, Robz888
scott_pilgrim (3): faust, Witherweaver, chairs

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Day 1 ends at 07:00 p.m. on July 7, 2014. That's in one hour.

[azadin]

I will probably lurk for at least a little bit, mostly because I really have no idea what sorts of things to say or do.

Though I've gone through some of the wiki that ADK posted to me earlier (Thanks, by the way!) and in the first post of the thread, so hopefully it won't take long for me to start catching on to some scummy tells!

In the meantime, I also jumped on the ADK wagon as more of a joke, but will Unvote for now until I can get a better feel for what's going on.

vote: azadin

No lurking.  If you're Town, then just posting "So here's what I think of this" even if it's "Well, I thought this was interesting and it makes me feel like X is more scummy/less scummy/posting too little/possibly an alien" is great.  The more that you post about what you're reading and what you think of what you read, the more interactions we get from you, the more we can in turn state what we think about your opinions, creating interactions of our own that you can then read into - which is how you get to say "Aha! Based on all these people talking, and what they're talking about (and ignoring), I can say that I think this one is the Mafioso plaguing our fair city!"... and eventually we lynch one, and find out if we were right, and that gives us more data to go through and refine our opinions of everyone else based on the interactions that occurred.

In other words, not talking is giving Mafia the excuse to not talk, and if they can get away with not talking, their Days are easier.

(This is a game. We are supposed to be having fun.  I am taking Mafia less serious-face-modo-mojo-jojo so anticipate that I will, occasionally, crack a joke.)

Also to take a page from Robz's book, vote: ww for using smiley.

Here. The wishy-washiness comes after this when he tries to weave jokes in and out of serious posting.

And yes, he was VLA'd for the holiday weekend, but since he's been back, he's contributed *nothing* but votes for people simply because they "aren't him." I guess he said he agreed with the scott_pilgrim case.

Let's try something else. Chairs: why shouldn't we lynch you?

[sudgy]

I want to do stuff, but I don't want to leave because I want to see what happens...

Let's try this: Why should I move my vote off you?

Because my case is "sudgy is playing how he always does.  Let's lynch him!"

[Witherweaver]

That's not very compelling, Azadin.  Chair making jokes is, as far as I can tell, a Chairs quality, not a scum or town quality.  Ash's argument that nervous joking could be indicative of scum is fine, but I see no nervous joking there. 

[Eevee]

I want to do stuff, but I don't want to leave because I want to see what happens...

Let's try this: Why should I move my vote off you?

Because my case is "sudgy is playing how he always does.  Let's lynch him!"

It's not, and you or ash repeating that over and over again isn't going to make it so.

[Eevee]

I'm on until the deadline as well.

[azadin]

That's not very compelling, Azadin.  Chair making jokes is, as far as I can tell, a Chairs quality, not a scum or town quality.  Ash's argument that nervous joking could be indicative of scum is fine, but I see no nervous joking there.

That's fair, and I am in the unfortunate position of having no forum meta knowledge whatsoever to go off of, so I'm relying more on individual things I see and gut reads. Unless I have a compelling reason to switch my vote, I'm staying where I'm at.

[azadin]

I'm on until the deadline as well.

Woot! Hey Eevee!

[EgorK]

I'm here and ready to hammer SP if we'd get to that. Would prefer chairs through

[Robz888]

Well, I prefer sudgy to chairs still, but I'm not sure there's time or possibility of any lynch but chairs, is there?

[Robz888]

Don't know if I care between scotty and chairs.

[Robz888]

Wish we had time for claims...

[chairs]

Did chairs claim? Chairs, are you going to claim? It sure looks like it's you--I will hammer you to obtain a lynch.

Not claiming.  Would rather see scott hammered than me, but rather me than no lynch, so if you can hold off until there's no chance anybody else is getting lynched go ahead and do it.

[sudgy]

Did chairs claim? Chairs, are you going to claim? It sure looks like it's you--I will hammer you to obtain a lynch.

Not claiming.  Would rather see scott hammered than me, but rather me than no lynch, so if you can hold off until there's no chance anybody else is getting lynched go ahead and do it.

We have half an hour.  I don't know if we have time.  I (hopefully) will be around to claim if the need comes, but I hope the need doesn't come.

[Robz888]

Did chairs claim? Chairs, are you going to claim? It sure looks like it's you--I will hammer you to obtain a lynch.

Not claiming.  Would rather see scott hammered than me, but rather me than no lynch, so if you can hold off until there's no chance anybody else is getting lynched go ahead and do it.

Scott isn't even in a position to be hammered, there are like three votes on him.

And I really think all this ideological non-claiming is bad. We've had a lot of this lately and I neither like it nor think it helps town. More people should claim at L-1, and you should certainly claim if you want to have a prayer of surviving here.

[Witherweaver]

I'm off now.  I don't see any reason to go to Sudgy or Chairs and am okay with Scott.  In fact I'm even wanting Chairs less after his last comment.. just doesn't seem like something scum would say.

[ashersky]

Did chairs claim? Chairs, are you going to claim? It sure looks like it's you--I will hammer you to obtain a lynch.

Chairs did not claim.  The sudgy lynch is falling apart (which is fine, given I still don't know why it was an option).

I think he should be given the opportunity to decide to claim or not.  He's on now, I think.

[Witherweaver]

He'd be in a position to be hammered if people started voting for him.

[scott_pilgrim]

He'd be in a position to be hammered if people started voting for him.

Except if people switch off chairs to sudgy, we may not be able to lynch either.  I'm willing to vote sudgy if I have to, but I prefer chairs and I feel like we're a lot more likely to get a lynch through if I stay there (and I'm guessing that's how most people voting chairs feel).